Chelski v Royals

[Marvin]

if you couldn't see that that was a team with extremely good attacking strength and midfield creativity you really and I mean really dont understand football

I wouldn't start throwing your weight around after a comment like that.

A dodgy pen, goalkeeping error and an offside goal. CFC really struggled and Reading should have had the game won in the 1st half.

 

[Stoned Rose]

If they are top or near top come February/March then yes I will agree with you.

That's good of you mate. You seriously need to wait until the season is nearly over to know if a team is a contender or not?


Reading and Wigan will be candidates for the drop this season.

Seems strange that you can confidenty spot relegation fodder after 2 games, but not a good team.

You probably think because a lady you fancy smiles at you twice in succession your a shoe in to rattle her cage later that night.

Ladies dont bother smiling at me mate they know I'm simply unattainable.

It rarely works out that way Stoned and if you think otherwise thats exactly what you will end up being but as you say in your name sake alone.

Again thanks for the insight but that makes no sense whatsoever and in fact isn't even a proper sentence.

School Teacher or Local Government Officer? Must be one or the other to be that condescending.

Wrong. Again.

 

[Tevez City]

It seems that the current bluemoon rules are:

It is only allowed to praise City players

Or players that Mancini or the club are interested in, and IF they ended up somewhere else they will become S**T and it is not allowed to praise them again.

You are not allowed to question the manager decisions at all until he leave the club.

The posters and some mods have the right to insult you, but if you defended yourself and spoke to them in the same trashy language they are using then you will be band.

 

[pudge]

I know it's fashionable to knock everything TC says but to be fair he has a point there. The lad looks fuckin mustard.

Its not fashionable SR its just that most people don't jump to conclusions.

He has pace , guile and knows how to draw a foul in the box and given the reports about him in France he is obviously a plus for Chelski and at 32m they would hope he is but lets not have a wank fest over the bloke after two games against mediocre opposition and on the basis of these performances think Chelski are the real deal again , its way too early for that.

bet you didn't join the Aguero wankfest post Swansea last season did you mate? you're far to suave and cool for that.

-- Wed Aug 22, 2012 10:12 pm --

Also seems fashionable to rate Hazard as the best Premier League player based on 2 performances against cannon fodder.

Not at all

I rates Hazard higher than Silva & Nasri before he signs for Chelsea.

I recall TC saying this in the Hazard thread several times and he was ridiculed each time by the BM school bullies.

hmmmmm who would I rather have?

Silva, a player who has performed on some of the biggest stages in football and has had to be singled out and man marked to try and stop.

Or Hazard, an arrogant prick who performed well in the french league and against Reading and Wigan, but fell flat on his face *literally* when faced with quality english opposition (us)

It's a toughie...

 

[Stoned Rose]

if you couldn't see that that was a team with extremely good attacking strength and midfield creativity you really and I mean really dont understand football

I wouldn't start throwing your weight around after a comment like that.

Sorry Marvin. I promise to stop throwing my weight around on the internet.

 

[Tevez City]

though I didn't like him in bad Tevez times, TC knows more about football than most of you that jump to say crap about him as soon as he posts something.

I am happy you are going into bat for the man MSP.

Most of us haven't said crap about him though to correct you , we have said he is jumping to conclusions and we have some point of disparity to the conclusions he draws after 187 minutes of 2012/2013 premiership football for Chelski.

As for him knowing more about football than us mere mortals again I am happy for you that you think that MSP.

I am not jumping on conclusions, there is something called " expectations"

Everyone can see that Hazard has high a potential, and I think he will meet it soon

At the end he may not !

Who knows what will happen at the end and how he will develope !

I am just expecting.

-- Wed Aug 22, 2012 10:33 pm --

Its not fashionable SR its just that most people don't jump to conclusions.

He has pace , guile and knows how to draw a foul in the box and given the reports about him in France he is obviously a plus for Chelski and at 32m they would hope he is but lets not have a wank fest over the bloke after two games against mediocre opposition and on the basis of these performances think Chelski are the real deal again , its way too early for that.

bet you didn't join the Aguero wankfest post Swansea last season did you mate? you're far to suave and cool for that.

-- Wed Aug 22, 2012 10:12 pm --

Not at all

I rates Hazard higher than Silva & Nasri before he signs for Chelsea.

I recall TC saying this in the Hazard thread several times and he was ridiculed each time by the BM school bullies.

hmmmmm who would I rather have?

Silva, a player who has performed on some of the biggest stages in football and has had to be singled out and man marked to try and stop.

Or Hazard, an arrogant prick who performed well in the french league and against Reading and Wigan, but fell flat on his face *literally* when faced with quality english opposition (us)

It's a toughie...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&v=FJnLmIEvooY&NR=1

 

[mancity1]

FFS you lot!!! if you couldn't see that that was a team with extremely good attacking strength and midfield creativity you really and I mean really dont understand football.

Yes they've played 2 average sides so far but last year when we slapped Swansea and Bolton I'm sure most reasonable people could 'see' we had a bloody good team and would be there or thereabouts.

You lads seriously disagree that they'll be genuine contenders for the league??

If they are top or near top come February/March then yes I will agree with you.

That's good of you mate. You seriously need to wait until the season is nearly over to know if a team is a contender or not?


Reading and Wigan will be candidates for the drop this season.

Seems strange that you can confidenty spot relegation fodder after 2 games, but not a good team.

You probably think because a lady you fancy smiles at you twice in succession your a shoe in to rattle her cage later that night.

Ladies dont bother smiling at me mate they know I'm simply unattainable.

It rarely works out that way Stoned and if you think otherwise thats exactly what you will end up being but as you say in your name sake alone.

Again thanks for the insight but that makes no sense whatsoever and in fact isn't even a proper sentence.

It makes sense if you think about it SR and its not hard to work out but I will spell it out for you.

If you come on to a lady too quickly you will end up alone and stoned like you say you are in using the first word of your location and the first word of your namesake.

First = one and First = one again, one and one make two the number of games Hazard has played in Chelski colours to date.

Its not strange that I confidenty ( as you describe it ) predict that Wigan and Reading will be candidates for relegation at all.

Wigan have been in a battle to avoid the drop for a number of seasons now and they haven't recruited as well as they would have liked.

They have done remarkable well to stay up the last two seasons and may well stay up this season but like Reading will need everything to go their way to ensure they are not in a scrap again come the last weeks of this season.

Chelsea are a good team but they currently based on the most recent history we have finished some 29 points behind two sides last season after 38 games.

I expect they will strenghten their squad even further before August 31 but at least at this stage of the season I would have to draw a long bow to conclude they can make up not only that difference with the inclusion of Hazard , no Drogba and a striker who is sadly out of form and I see little in him to convince me that he will improve this season on what he did last season , on the two Manchester Clubs as well as the likes of Spurs and Arsenal.

Finally its a pity that ladies don't bother smiling at you because it can brighten up your day when they do but of course they all know before they have even heard you speak a word that you are unattainable (LOL).

Clever are the female species arn't they SR alot smarter than you and I and I for one would ask a random sample of say 300 of them if they think and know that Chelsea will be there or there about's this year.

 

[Blue Haze]

Watched Hazard a dozen times at least last season. What he's done so far in the PL is nothing short of his huge potential. Yeah it was Reading and Wigan, but that doesn't take away from the fact that he's doing what everyone (including Zidane) knows he can do. It isn't because the opposition is Reading, it's because Hazard is good.

The point TC made about Sinclair's fee being the same as the agent fee that cost us Hazard is a bit sickening tbh.

 

[pudge]

though I didn't like him in bad Tevez times, TC knows more about football than most of you that jump to say crap about him as soon as he posts something.

I am happy you are going into bat for the man MSP.

Most of us haven't said crap about him though to correct you , we have said he is jumping to conclusions and we have some point of disparity to the conclusions he draws after 187 minutes of 2012/2013 premiership football for Chelski.

As for him knowing more about football than us mere mortals again I am happy for you that you think that MSP.

I am not jumping on conclusions, there is something called " expectations"

Everyone can see that Hazard has high a potential, and I think he will meet it soon

At the end he may not !

Who knows what will happen at the end and how he will develope !

I am just expecting.

-- Wed Aug 22, 2012 10:33 pm --

bet you didn't join the Aguero wankfest post Swansea last season did you mate? you're far to suave and cool for that.

-- Wed Aug 22, 2012 10:12 pm --



I recall TC saying this in the Hazard thread several times and he was ridiculed each time by the BM school bullies.

hmmmmm who would I rather have?

Silva, a player who has performed on some of the biggest stages in football and has had to be singled out and man marked to try and stop.

Or Hazard, an arrogant prick who performed well in the french league and against Reading and Wigan, but fell flat on his face *literally* when faced with quality english opposition (us)

It's a toughie...

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p7dqdHLR09w[/youtube]

Don't worry I took the effort to look at the video, although it's not that hard to post one.

And if you thought I was using that as a serious knock on him, then I can understand how you can't work the youtube function.

He was awful in the CS, average for most of the Wigan game and I only watch the second half of tonight's game but only noted his appearance when he ran unopposed to tap the ball across the 6 yard box for a tap in.

I'm afraid the jury is still out on him until he comes up against quality opposition and performs.

 

[MSP]

though I didn't like him in bad Tevez times, TC knows more about football than most of you that jump to say crap about him as soon as he posts something.

I am happy you are going into bat for the man MSP.

Most of us haven't said crap about him though to correct you , we have said he is jumping to conclusions and we have some point of disparity to the conclusions he draws after 187 minutes of 2012/2013 premiership football for Chelski.

As for him knowing more about football than us mere mortals again I am happy for you that you think that MSP.

I wasn't aware we were in a contest of all things football knowledge wise but as you allude to we are can I ask you what knowing more about football than someone else actually constitutes?

for first bold, it's not true. Can't read all posts and individuals that did other stuff but as usual most answers to TC's posts were - are you still here, ban this wum, go to chelasea forum (he was rag before when it was popular) etc, etc..

for 2nd one - cause I find him to understand football better than lot of those who ridicule him, have a pretty good judgment on players.. nothing to scientifically prove but as everyone throws their own crap, why wouldn't I do it too ;)