twinkletoes
Well-Known Member
blueinsa said:
If all City fans have that attitude then it's bound to happen.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Chris Bailey article (The voice of reason)
- Thread starter waterfootblues
- Start date
If all City fans have that attitude then it's bound to happen.
twinkletoes said:Mark Hughes has the best record of any City manager in the premier league. Check the facts.
Ericksson 55 from 38 matches - 1.44 points per match
Hughes 47 from 37 matches - 1.27 points per match
How Hughes has the best record is beyond me.
Blue Mooner said:They're moe bothered about being proven right than actualy seeing some success. That is just pathetic and sad and you don't deserve to be called a City fan.
Absolute bollocks.
A
A
Anonymous
Guest
The very fact that so many journo's & pundits (eg, the degenerate crackhead) think it's a good thing that Hughes has been given longer is, for me, a bloody good reason for thinking it's a bad idea :-)
twinkletoes
Well-Known Member
moomba said:twinkletoes said:Mark Hughes has the best record of any City manager in the premier league. Check the facts.
Ericksson 55 from 38 matches - 1.44 points per match
Hughes 47 from 37 matches - 1.27 points per match
How Hughes has the best record is beyond me.
Win ratio 44% for Hughes. I think winning is the most important stat to look at.
A
A
Anonymous
Guest
twinkletoes said:moomba said:twinkletoes said:Mark Hughes has the best record of any City manager in the premier league. Check the facts.
Ericksson 55 from 38 matches - 1.44 points per match
Hughes 47 from 37 matches - 1.27 points per match
How Hughes has the best record is beyond me.
Win ratio 44% for Hughes. I think winning is the most important stat to look at.
So the league table is decided on wins now and not points! There's so many things I thought I knew about football but apparently I've been wrong all along. :-S
I would rather make my own mind up on Hughes. not impressed with being told being out of europe is a blessing, actually it pisses me off. not impressed with buying a striker everyone new would would play only a few games before breaking down and being constantly injured, not impressed with the thought of buying yet another injury prone striker in RSC who we know will only play a handful of games before breaking down and injured for most of the season. we alll know he will piss away 18m on him and what a waste. poor fucking judgement
oh and im sick of hearing how fucking undervalued he thinks he is. oh and all the added pressure on him, now hes being told top 6 on a budget next season by the owners.....priceless.
been away for 2 weeks so theres my bit on it !
oh and im sick of hearing how fucking undervalued he thinks he is. oh and all the added pressure on him, now hes being told top 6 on a budget next season by the owners.....priceless.
been away for 2 weeks so theres my bit on it !
twinkletoes said:Win ratio 44% for Hughes. I think winning is the most important stat to look at.
Erciksson - 38 matches, 15 wins
Hughes - 37 matches, 14 wins.
Even when you're desperate to find a stat to back up you're claim it's a bit tougher than you would think.
For God sake he's staying get over it and wait and see who he signs over the Summer.By the way though all you happy people who think Hughes is clueless,will you be happy if we finish in the top six or will you spend all next May saying a decent manager would have finished in the top four?
Craig said:For God sake he's staying get over it and wait and see who he signs over the Summer.By the way though all you happy people who think Hughes is clueless,will you be happy if we finish in the top six or will you spend all next May saying a decent manager would have finished in the top four?
i'm still think hughes will get the boot if the owers find a suitable replacement