blueparrot
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Jun 2012
- Messages
- 29,671
Not for me.
Not for me.
Look great there, but that's a kit without any maroon on it.
We don’t really give money to the club as such as a lot of it will go to puma, I actually could be wrong there but I thought this was the case. Either way, I spend a fortune on tickets every year so not paying £70 for a bit of blue cloth doesn’t bother me.Would rather give my money to the club that some dodgy overseas retailer.
I used to get mine from Thailand when I used to go at Christmas every year, they used to be all spot apart from one which the badge was slightly off, but you could barely tell. I’m pretty sure these fake tops are just cast offs that haven’t past a quality test from the pumas supplier. That’s a conspiracy for you right there!On all the ones I have seen the badges always look dodgy normally the text around them can spot them a mile off
The fakes are also a rip off and don't benefit the club we support in any way.Anyone that pays full price for a City shirt needs their head testing. The fakes you can get online haven’t got any defects, they’re pretty much the real thing for fraction of the cost. Football shirts are just another thing for clubs to rip you off with.
I know. That's why I said that although I liked navy socks, I would choose option 1. ;)Look great there, but that's a kit without any maroon on it.
Charging £70 for an item of clothing that will have expired in 12 months time, and costs less than £10 to make and distribute doesn't benefit the club's supporters in any way.The fakes are also a rip off and don't benefit the club we support in any way.
They do look good when the top has navy trim, but i wouldn't have them if we're going with maroon trim
Nice, reminds me of the kits when i was a lad