Centurions
Well-Known Member
Why on earth would UEFA do that? Because some bitter little opposing fan on another forum wrote it and it got repeated?K-Bo said:
Even UEFA know better than that.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
City & FFP | 2020/21 Accounts released | Revenues of £569.8m, £2.4m profit (p 2395)
- Thread starter Marvin
- Start date
Even UEFA know better than that.
SilverFox2
Well-Known Member
ADUG surely were aware that UEFA were untrustworthy when they agreed the compromise fine ?
If our legal team have not got the detail completely sorted they need to be sacked.
Surely both sides are absolutely certain what can or cannot be done and there is no need to publish anything other than the apparently elastic resume.
If our legal team have not got the detail completely sorted they need to be sacked.
Surely both sides are absolutely certain what can or cannot be done and there is no need to publish anything other than the apparently elastic resume.
K-Bo said:Seeing how after months of debate on here hasn't really ended in a definitive answer, signing bony for 30 mil plus is surely a massive risk regarding the spending cap. Particularly if UEFA deem our figure for Mangala to be incorrect which they might. Basically betting everything on it being done yearly and not by season. Given how elastic a definition UEFA have left themselves to work with, that is a massive risk.
If it's still being debated then that's a clear indication that most are posting information based on perception/opinion.
I'd stop worrying and enjoy the football, one day it will all be over one way or the other.
K-Bo said:Seeing how after months of debate on here hasn't really ended in a definitive answer, signing bony for 30 mil plus is surely a massive risk regarding the spending cap. Particularly if UEFA deem our figure for Mangala to be incorrect which they might. Basically betting everything on it being done yearly and not by season. Given how elastic a definition UEFA have left themselves to work with, that is a massive risk.
Why on Earth would they do that?!
Bottomless_Sailor
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 24 Jun 2013
- Messages
- 536
Do we know if the FFP restrictions stop Bony playing in the knockout rounds?
Fast strong Drogba-style players have done well against Barcelona in the past...
Fast strong Drogba-style players have done well against Barcelona in the past...
Bottomless_Sailor said:Do we know if the FFP restrictions stop Bony playing in the knockout rounds?
Fast strong Drogba-style players have done well against Barcelona in the past...
It's my understanding that we would have to drop one of the foreigners.
Mark - TheBlue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 30 Nov 2008
- Messages
- 3,605
If Nastasic ends up going to Schalke for 10 and the Negredo money comes in at the end of the season 24m? Then the fee is covered through player sales.
MeatHunterrr
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 24 Apr 2014
- Messages
- 11,440
+ some dosh for Guidetti and Sinclair, about £5m combined.Mark - TheBlue said:If Nastasic ends up going to Schalke for 10 and the Negredo money comes in at the end of the season 24m? Then the fee is covered through player sales.
I'm no cynic but...
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2013
- Messages
- 4,000
- Location
- True friends stab you in the front.
- Team supported
- The one and only City
How does FFP really work with transfer fees? Is it based on the headline figure, eg £32m for Mangala, or is it based on how his fee is paid to his former club, eg £8m per year for four years? I don't know the exact figures or the means of payment, I only ask regarding the principle that is applied as FFP to one person in authority might mean something entirely different to another similarly in a position of authority.
Chippy_boy
Well-Known Member
I'm no cynic said:How does FFP really work with transfer fees? Is it based on the headline figure, eg £32m for Mangala, or is it based on how his fee is paid to his former club, eg £8m per year for four years? I don't know the exact figures or the means of payment, I only ask regarding the principle that is applied as FFP to one person in authority might mean something entirely different to another similarly in a position of authority.
How and when you pay doesn't matter, it's how much the deal us for that matters.
That said, there's a standard way of accounting for intangible assets such as footballers, and that is to spread the cost over the duration of the contract. So if a player is bought for say £15m and signs on a 3 year contract, you take an expense of £5m per year in your accounts. Note this has nothing to do with when you pay the selling club.