They do make a specific claim that losses relating to MCFC have been reported elsewhere and are not included in City's accounts
Are those the costs associated with the City Football Group. When the report says most of their business was done effectively on behalf of MCFC, that's quite an ambiguous statement. Are they saying that costs directly incurred by MCFC are being put through the books of another company, o are they just saying that costs incurred by the overseas groups related to City were booked through City Football Group? The allegations are too imprecise, and therefore I think it's just mud slinging. If I was a journalist and had something I'd really make my case, this tory doesn't. It just leaves you with questions about their story. But we are biased, and sometimes don't see the wood for the treesTwo subsidiary companies, City Football Marketing Ltd and City Football Services Ltd, had operating expenses — or costs, including wages — of £36.7m in the year to May 2014, and posted combined losses of £25.9m. Most of their business was done effectively on behalf of Manchester City.
Read more: <a class="postlink" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2904903/Manchester-City-face-new-cash-probe-network-global-companies-sharing-financial-losses.html#ixzz3OT7dgjVX" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... z3OT7dgjVX</a>
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook