FanchesterCity
Well-Known Member
The danger with a court ruling is that they may not rule absolutely for or against FFP, instead, they could spell out which aspects of FFP they believe to be legitimate and which they don't.
The problem with that is that before FFP, there were no restrictions, so a court throwing out some aspects of FFP is not new benefit to clubs.... however, if they identify some legitimate aspects of FFP, then that will only steer UEFA in a slightly different direction, but now a legally supported one.
It's a bit like saying 'you can't use a gun in this fight, UEFA, but we do think a baseball bat is ok'. We'll just be hit with a baseball bat then, and we'll have even less hope of challenging it.
It's only really a win for clubs if it's entirely ruled illegal, anything less is still a problem.
BUT, it's clubs behind us that have the bigger problem, we (as we always knew) just about scraped into the elite before the drawbridge came up, and we're still having to squeeze our way in.
The problem with that is that before FFP, there were no restrictions, so a court throwing out some aspects of FFP is not new benefit to clubs.... however, if they identify some legitimate aspects of FFP, then that will only steer UEFA in a slightly different direction, but now a legally supported one.
It's a bit like saying 'you can't use a gun in this fight, UEFA, but we do think a baseball bat is ok'. We'll just be hit with a baseball bat then, and we'll have even less hope of challenging it.
It's only really a win for clubs if it's entirely ruled illegal, anything less is still a problem.
BUT, it's clubs behind us that have the bigger problem, we (as we always knew) just about scraped into the elite before the drawbridge came up, and we're still having to squeeze our way in.