It was, but it is obvious from the comments made that it still hasn't sunk in yet.Good article explaining it to the simpletons
Good article explaining it to the simpletons
I wouldn't say it was a great article. Nick Harris was adamant, only two months ago, that City wouldn't be able to spend anything like £150m this summer. People questioned his assertion at the time, and have been gleefully retweeting his original posts recently.
This article is merely his way of trying to prove he was right all along which, patently, he wasn't. The last bit of his article seems pretty petty, but he's a cantankerous sod at the best of times.
Yes. I distinctly remember how the Sheikh distanced himself from the chairman's professed spending plans this summer and told Mr Harris all about it over the phone.But but but but the Sheikh himself rang him to tell him so....
From the outside this looks like an article backing city, but it's basically Harris covering his backside from his last article on city's summer spending. He was wrong and he now knows it.
I wouldn't say it was a great article. Nick Harris was adamant, only two months ago, that City wouldn't be able to spend anything like £150m this summer. People questioned his assertion at the time, and have been gleefully retweeting his original posts recently.
This article is merely his way of trying to prove he was right all along which, patently, he wasn't. The last bit of his article seems pretty petty, but he's a cantankerous sod at the best of times.
Well don't bloody tell him, I'm looking forward to the meltdown when the accounts are released.Indeed RIC. You can take a horse to water but you still can't get it to drink. He still hasn't worked out the big one - For all City's FFP financial restrictions to be lifted (as they were - confirmed by UEFA eventually), City had to make a profit (FFP wise) in season 2014/15.