gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
I post on redcafe as ‘martinedwardstoiletcubicle’.Genuine question. Do you post on redcafe under the name Padr81? He's a City fan who clearly despises our owners for some reason
I post on redcafe as ‘martinedwardstoiletcubicle’.Genuine question. Do you post on redcafe under the name Padr81? He's a City fan who clearly despises our owners for some reason
but his wealth is the reason we could outspend everyone if spending was unrestricted, this is hypothetically speaking of course. I don't think it's a good idea to allow that.
I intentionally boiled a few peoples piss who needed it boiling.
Well quite. Esteban’s core point that a billionaire aided unfettered spending spree could damge football is undoubtedly theoretically a live oneBut thats simply not supported by the facts... City set a value for a player like VVD or Maguire and we steadfastly refuse to budge.
Impossible to say if they were even interested in some of our signings(they mocked the Silva, Yaya and Aguero deals) but isn't a better point that if not City, then it would be someone else spending more to build the best squad? If not Chelsea, then United, if not United then Liverpool or Arsenal, that's the way it's always been since the 60s. What is the point it pretending that football would be any better in any of those scenarios? Since City still have one of the lowest club record signings among the Euro elite clubs it's pretty obvious the transfer market wouldn't be much different either, City are nowhere near the top inflators of the transfer market.
It's also a fact that the first decade of the PL was one of the least competitive on record, in terms on names on the title and the amount of teams in the top 4 I'd reckon too.
They got rid of KdB as he wasnt good enough :Dyou're missing my point. Had we not got the investment - i reckon a lot of the players we ended up with would have ended up at Chelsea because they had the money to outbid the rags etc
I mean, even if it were all true what’s so wrong with “oil money” anyway compared to other types of money? Liverpool had “Pools money” so effectively gambling money, West Ham have “porno money” as a result of the Dildo Brothers owning the club, and United had “Rotten meat” money as Louis Edwards was poisoning schoolkids across Greater Manchester before conveniently doing a Robert Maxwell on the eve of a World In Action expose into his activities. Latterly it became “sex pest” money when his son took over the reigns.And don't forget the world's largest solar power plant. In fact Abu Dhabi is one of the world's leading countries for renewable energy. But don't let the inconvenient facts get in the way of the "dirty oil money" narrative. Every single penny invested in City and CFG has been driven by Sheikh Mansour moving away from any dependency in his business on fossil fuel revenues. He has successfully achieved this, making a huge profit in the process. At some stage the English press will have to change their fake story about how City are actually funded. The media is just looking increasingly stupid.
World’s Largest Solar Power Plant Moves Forward In Abu Dhabi With Contract Award
2GW plant is to be developed by a multinational consortium and should start producing power within two yearswww.forbes.com
M-etc doesnt have the same pizzazz as G-dav.I post on redcafe as ‘martinedwardstoiletcubicle’.
My sobriquet on redcafe is ‘M-peep‘.M-etc doesnt have the same pizzazz as G-dav.