Not nearly enough!Say Amazon want to pay us 200m a year for an shirt deal is that fine?
Would be assessed for fair value. Would it pass? Hmmm...
Not nearly enough!Say Amazon want to pay us 200m a year for an shirt deal is that fine?
Not nearly enough!
Would be assessed for fair value. Would it pass? Hmmm...
I am assuming that the new rules will mirror UEFA. Any transaction over 30% of turnover is automatically deemed related. (But only if associated?)So they going assesses none related sponsors then?
Yes, but hard if there are a shortage of comparablesIs there a legal definition of "at arms length".
I am assuming that the new rules will mirror UEFA. Any transaction over 30% of turnover is automatically deemed related. (But only if associated?)
Until PL issue a full set of final rules we are all guessing a bit.
If you are City, related parties include anyone you once had a coffee with. If you are a red shirt, there are no related parties.Aren’t Related parties only from the country our owner is from seeing he is royalty?
Say Amazon want to pay us 200m a year for an shirt deal is that fine?
Surely by now we all realize that the need for rules is to allow UEFA and PL to expect strict adherence by City whilst choosing to ignore conformity by others.lets open up all the football clubs accounts and put them on the table and let see what's going on and make them public ? if football clubs keep saying the fans are the main people at the football clubs then show us the accounts to prove it
is it only manchester city that the books are closely monitored and reviewed by UEFA and the premier league and media ? like many already have said united and the so called elite books are never in question