City & FFP | 2020/21 Accounts released | Revenues of £569.8m, £2.4m profit (p 2395)

Re: City & FFP (continued)

squirtyflower said:
Still no one posting the sanctions?

Come on they must be given, every media outlet says we have them
Here you go, I have it on good authority (from the guy on the checkout at the Asda) that we're getting all of the following :-

a) warning;
b) reprimand;
c) fine;
d) annulment of the result of a match;
e) order that a match be replayed;
f) deduction of points (for the current and/or a future competition);
g) order that a match be forfeited;
h) playing of a match behind closed doors;
i) full or partial stadium closure;
j) playing of a match in a third country;
k) withholding of revenues from a UEFA competition;
l) prohibition on registering new players in UEFA competitions;
m) restriction on the number of players that a club may register for participation
in UEFA competitions;
n) disqualification from competitions in progress and/or exclusion from future
competitions;
o) withdrawal of a title or award;
p) withdrawal of a licence
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

I wonder how we would react if they declared the Etihad deal a RPT but said it meets fair value.
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

BlueAnorak said:
No matter what the club did the Star chamber were always going to hit City hard.
I reckon City will simply pay the entrance fee to the golden trough but state categorically the UEFA are wrong in their assumptions. Then sue there arses off whn FFP is rulled illegal.
How can you sue UEFA though? I hate them but suing them could destroy them and that might be a case of jumping from the frying pan to the fire.

Hopefully they'll come to some decent compromise.
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

ColinLee said:
squirtyflower said:
Still no one posting the sanctions?

Come on they must be given, every media outlet says we have them
Here you go, I have it on good authority (from the guy on the checkout at the Asda) that we're getting all of the following :-

a) warning;
b) reprimand;
c) fine;
d) annulment of the result of a match;
e) order that a match be replayed;
f) deduction of points (for the current and/or a future competition);
g) order that a match be forfeited;
h) playing of a match behind closed doors;
i) full or partial stadium closure;
j) playing of a match in a third country;
k) withholding of revenues from a UEFA competition;
l) prohibition on registering new players in UEFA competitions;
m) restriction on the number of players that a club may register for participation
in UEFA competitions;
n) disqualification from competitions in progress and/or exclusion from future
competitions;
o) withdrawal of a title or award;
p) withdrawal of a licence
He know his onions
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

squirtyflower said:
Still no one posting the sanctions?

Come on they must be given, every media outlet says we have them

Quite. It's Friday - the day after the know it all twats said we'd find out what media 'sources' have been proclaiming all week.
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

if we do win the premiership , the daily mail will probably start a campaign to have it annulled and given to the martyrs because they play the best football and all their players are english and play for free.
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

toffee balls said:
stony said:
I wonder how we would react if they declared the Etihad deal a RPT but said it meets fair value.

Don't let PB see this , he will throw a wobbler.

You have been warned
That would be quite funny in one sense. There is nothing in theory to stop them declaring that the Etihad deal is an RPT in fact. The quoted examples in FFP/IAS24 are not deemed to be exhaustive.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.