Tim of the Oak
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Dec 2012
- Messages
- 18,818
Re: City & FFP (continued)
OK then OB1, we are referring to the consultants who were reported to be involved in developing FFP for UEFA. You know doubt realised that.
If these people (who we reportedly contracted) did not include qualified accountants (and we didn't check their credentials) we deserved to get shafted.
OB1 said:EalingBlue2 said:Our accountants do this under accounting standards there will be absolutely no reason or any justification to sue them . It is also in our interests that the punishment look harsh then it's hard to appeal and everyone can be self satisfied whilst we go on business as usualTrueBlue1705 said:Agree with this. City owners need to wise up now - We need the best 'spin doctor' money can buy for a start to compete in the media circus and then sue the sh*t out of our accountants who have presumably been paid millions whilst telling our owners all the time that we were on course to pass FFP when they knew all along that we were skating on very thin ice with some of the creative accounting!! .....
Do people actually have any clue what they are talking about when they say sue our accountants? The answer, by the way, is: "no".
Our accountants are the guys who are employees of the club.
Our auditors are the guys who sign off the stautory accounts as part of a legal requirement that has absolutely nothing to do with FFP.
OK then OB1, we are referring to the consultants who were reported to be involved in developing FFP for UEFA. You know doubt realised that.
If these people (who we reportedly contracted) did not include qualified accountants (and we didn't check their credentials) we deserved to get shafted.