Tricky_Trev
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 32,343
Ah ok! Apologies for understating your loyal service and commitment to the cause :)
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
City fined £35,000 for anti-doping admin error
- Thread starter domalino
- Start date
shinpads
Well-Known Member
its already dissapeared from sky sports news ticker. non story, built up into a shitstorm by hacks , thats about the sum of it
The perfect fumble
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jun 2012
- Messages
- 24,441
@StuBrennanMEN The FA have charged us for "paperwork" but couldn't find systematic child abuse by its coaches over a 30 year period ?
Metalartin
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Jul 2015
- Messages
- 12,372
So a player insinuating a ref who may just have had a shit day was like a 12th man for the other team is out of order because it brings the game into disrepute by simply sharing his thoughts via a tweet?
Yet a smear campaign against a club is fine(shouldn't there be rules stopping David Gill and his merry men going to press willy nilly like that?) deliberately alluding to some form of cheating via doping with no evidence to back it up other than not following their protocol of sharing their whereabouts?
Yet a smear campaign against a club is fine(shouldn't there be rules stopping David Gill and his merry men going to press willy nilly like that?) deliberately alluding to some form of cheating via doping with no evidence to back it up other than not following their protocol of sharing their whereabouts?
KingCarlito
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 19 Jun 2015
- Messages
- 1,274
Swear I've just seen Guardiola's head fly past my window, he's gona be raging when he sees this.
Oh well, minor clerical error no doubt, let the media hype it up and get all the pub football fans on side. Lickle City ruining football since 2008.
As a club, I wouldn't give them the pleasure of an aggressive response or any legal action. I'd laugh it off, kill them with kindness and let the talking be done on the pitch. When we win a few titles, it'll hurt these media ****s and armchair fans even more, that way.
Oh well, minor clerical error no doubt, let the media hype it up and get all the pub football fans on side. Lickle City ruining football since 2008.
As a club, I wouldn't give them the pleasure of an aggressive response or any legal action. I'd laugh it off, kill them with kindness and let the talking be done on the pitch. When we win a few titles, it'll hurt these media ****s and armchair fans even more, that way.
BucksBlue
Well-Known Member
To rub salt in the slur the BBC post an image of the old badge on the lead article on their football page. Lazy, shoddy and tacky journalism in all aspects. I resent paying my licence fee!
We've already had our punishment mate. A public shaming and a lingering suggestion of being dopers, the fine will be neither here nor there and the FA knows it.It's a nothing story. We'll get a minor fine and a slap on the wrist for a mundane clerical error.
Trevor Morley's Tache
Well-Known Member
Wow!!!@StuBrennanMEN The FA have charged us for "paperwork" but couldn't find systematic child abuse by its coaches over a 30 year period ?
Prestwich_Blue
Well-Known Member
Of course it would. Care to explain why the FA didn't award last season's abandoned game against Bournemouth at the swamp to the visitors? Because that's in their rules and it was due to the negligence of the host club due to an event that was under their control.This would happen to any club that made the same mistake.