City fined £35,000 for anti-doping admin error

It seems this is the third time we've failed to update the relevant information according to The Guardian and the FA operates a 'three strikes' rule. That's why we've been charged. If it really has happened twice, we've been warned about it on both occasions and it's been allowed to happen for a third time, someone at the club wants a huge kick up the arse. I'm not convinced that senior management at the club is focused enough on City. Seem to be too thinly spread across CFG.
You think Soriano fills out the forms?

Or does it simply fit your current view on him to blame him?
 
It seems this is the third time we've failed to update the relevant information according to The Guardian and the FA operates a 'three strikes' rule. That's why we've been charged. If it really has happened twice, we've been warned about it on both occasions and it's been allowed to happen for a third time, someone at the club wants a huge kick up the arse. I'm not convinced that senior management at the club is focused enough on City. Seem to be too thinly spread across CFG.

3 times - you got to be joking??? thats going down the Ferdinand route of stupidity - but not sure it needs top £££ management to get a basic form filled in
 
has any FA charge ever not been published? or this just more crazy whipped up paranoia?

I will bet you now the FA have not published every charge. There are issues relating to drug offences on a regular basis that will never have been published. I can assure you of that.
has any FA charge ever not been published? or this just more crazy whipped up paranoia?

Has every FA charge been published? If you do not know, then you are hardly in a position to state that it is paranoia to think otherwise.

Do you not think the timing is odd?
 
It seems this is the third time we've failed to update the relevant information according to The Guardian and the FA operates a 'three strikes' rule. That's why we've been charged. If it really has happened twice, we've been warned about it on both occasions and it's been allowed to happen for a third time, someone at the club wants a huge kick up the arse. I'm not convinced that senior management at the club is focused enough on City. Seem to be too thinly spread across CFG.
We should employ Rio
 
though the posters in the Bradley Wiggins thread would not agree surely? Pity we didn't take this more seriously, didn't Kolo fail a drugs test when he was with us?

obviously admin error, but stupid of the club, don't want to fall foul of doping regs, then fill in the forms

Comparing not filling in a form to an intra muscular injection? Bloody hell. You may have called me paranoid but at least I am not as think as a whale omelette.
 
Because we've made waves about refereeing?

Over the last decade which club/managers have made the most waves about refereeing? GPC,wenger,mourinho come to mind, touch line bans,fines,warnings. Do we seriously believe the fa have gathered together to do us because of a comment by Sagna which plenty of players from other clubs have done and been penalised for or because pep had a grump on? To what end.
 
It seems this is the third time we've failed to update the relevant information according to The Guardian and the FA operates a 'three strikes' rule. That's why we've been charged. If it really has happened twice, we've been warned about it on both occasions and it's been allowed to happen for a third time, someone at the club wants a huge kick up the arse. I'm not convinced that senior management at the club is focused enough on City. Seem to be too thinly spread across CFG.

If true then you're right. Someone needs a P45.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.