You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
City fined £35,000 for anti-doping admin error
- Thread starter domalino
- Start date
That reads to me that he is an utter ABC twat ..amazing what you can do with figuresDaily Dickhead Canon at it again.
He really does hate city. :-)
He will never let it go. Mot until he takes his last breath.
Manchester City doping charge shows depth of inequality in football
By Lee Hurley -
Jan 12, 2017
The FA have charged Manchester City with a doping offence, and while it’s not as exciting as you might think, it does pose quite a few questions.
http://dailycannon.com/2017/01/manchester-city-doping-charge-shows-depth-inequality-football/
Even his punishment idea is wrong ,points deduction can mean more to a lesser club.That does not matter to people like him as long as they can be seen having a go at City
oakiecokie
Well-Known Member
Apparently the size of the fine is based on your Clubs wealth.Ours therefore will be £100M and the unfortunate Fleetwoods will be £0.01p.
This.Nothing to do with "Agenda". We've fucked up and deserve to be punished. I just hope it isnt anything too embarrassing
Dave Ewing's Back 'eader
Well-Known Member
It's another area where those Rags with journalistic spades will continue digging until they hit some pay dirt! Expect them to come up with other 'revelations'. I often think that there's an office on Whitehall that is charged with coming up with new tax ideas - areas that can be taxed and bring in shedloads compared with collection expenses. I think that some Rag journos are doing the same with City - let's see if we can find something that niggles and costs!
Dave Ewing's Back 'eader
Well-Known Member
Nothing to do with "Agenda". We've fucked up and deserve to be punished. I just hope it isnt anything too embarrassing
Nothing to do with doping either, more with poor clerking! But put doping and MCFC in the same sentence and it'll be worth gold for the click baiters!
TRUE BLUE NO1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 24 Jun 2013
- Messages
- 8,200
I agree, the press seem to be making a big thing of this but the fact is(from reading reports)....this is the 3rd breach over a 12month period, so only got ourselves to blame! I can understand an admin error once, even twice but a 3rd time? Just makes us look clueless.
Last edited:
Stevieatlasblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Jul 2015
- Messages
- 2,692
This story is growing legs..have we messed up big time?I'm getting worried.I'll support them ever more..even in the conference.
casserole of nonsense
Well-Known Member
Somebody wants firing if it is third warning that has resulted in the charge. The vast majority of other clubs seem to be able to get this right.
It's no good complaining when we keep feeding the agenda monkeys.
It's no good complaining when we keep feeding the agenda monkeys.
Somebody wants firing if it is third warning that has resulted in the charge. The vast majority of other clubs seem to be able to get this right.
It's no good complaining when we keep feeding the agenda monkeys.
I agree, once is incompetence, three times is negligence, the person or persons responsible and their line manager should be fired. Apart from the financial penalty it is damaging to our global reputation - CEO should be fuming