Again - I agree with you but it would be right & proper to know how often it happens. For all the general public know there might be lots of clubs that have transgressed twice a year for years but they just fall under the radar. Because this is not made public, the charge against City appears isolated & possibly more serious than it is because everyone assumes they're the only club that have ever been so careless. All I ask for is transparency within the FA PL UEFA in all aspects of decision making & disciplinary issues
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
City fined £35,000 for anti-doping admin error
- Thread starter domalino
- Start date
Again - I agree with you but it would be right & proper to know how often it happens. For all the general public know there might be lots of clubs that have transgressed twice a year for years but they just fall under the radar. Because this is not made public, the charge against City appears isolated & possibly more serious than it is because everyone assumes they're the only club that have ever been so careless. All I ask for is transparency within the FA PL UEFA in all aspects of decision making & disciplinary issues
Colin Bells Boots
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 17,456
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Again - I agree with you but it would be right & proper to know how often it happens. For all the general public know there might be lots of clubs that have transgressed twice a year for years but they just fall under the radar. Because this is not made public, the charge against City appears isolated & possibly more serious than it is because everyone assumes they're the only club that have ever been so careless. All I ask for is transparency within the FA PL UEFA in all aspects of decision making & disciplinary issues
Not an unreasonable request, but one which I think is highly unlikely. These organisations are not known for such openness in the way they operate.
CharliesRightPeg
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 Aug 2015
- Messages
- 589
aren't the FA above FOI requests so can't even ask them how often this actually happens ?
Dave Ewing's Back 'eader
Well-Known Member
Not an unreasonable request, but one which I think is highly unlikely. These organisations are not known for such openness in the way they operate.
They can't be open or else the chemical effluent hits the whizzy thing in the ceiling! The game'd be up for these jokers!
nmc
Well-Known Member
Again - I agree with you but it would be right & proper to know how often it happens. For all the general public know there might be lots of clubs that have transgressed twice a year for years but they just fall under the radar. Because this is not made public, the charge against City appears isolated & possibly more serious than it is because everyone assumes they're the only club that have ever been so careless. All I ask for is transparency within the FA PL UEFA in all aspects of decision making & disciplinary issues
I think your post is the only time you will see transparency and the FA used in the same sentence! (Well apart from this one!)
In a multi million pound company that slight administrative error has caused ridiculous headlines and probably a fine. The person responsible should now be queuing at the job centre. It's unacceptable and should never happen again. We are our own worst enemy sometimes.
oakiecokie
Well-Known Member
Especially if we are lead to believe that this is now the third occasion this has happened.It shouldn`t just stop with the office junior, but bigger fry within the organisation.In a multi million pound company that slight administrative error has caused ridiculous headlines and probably a fine. The person responsible should now be queuing at the job centre. It's unacceptable and should never happen again. We are our own worst enemy sometimes.
SilverFox2
Well-Known Member
In a multi million pound company that slight administrative error has caused ridiculous headlines and probably a fine. The person responsible should now be queuing at the job centre. It's unacceptable and should never happen again. We are our own worst enemy sometimes.
Is it possible that the player or players were the ones who disregarded their appointment ?
Nice and easy to blame admin rather than an individual. May in fact suit City for this to be the case rather than have potential action being taken against an individual player.
andyhinch
Well-Known Member
You don't mean the cod farther ?Especially if we are lead to believe that this is now the third occasion this has happened.It shouldn`t just stop with the office junior, but bigger fry within the organisation.