aguero93:20
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Oct 2013
- Messages
- 90,256
- Location
- Hunting Cats.
- Team supported
- Some gobshites in day-glo green and black.
We mustn't have told them Yaya was in Dagenham on the piss.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
City fined £35,000 for anti-doping admin error
- Thread starter domalino
- Start date
oakiecokie
Well-Known Member
Manchester City have been charged by the Football Association for failing to ensure anti-doping officials knew where players were for drugs testing.
Clubs are required to provide accurate details of training sessions and player whereabouts so that they are available for testing at all times.
The club allegedly failed to ensure that their 'club whereabouts' information was accurate.
City have until 19 January to respond to the charge.
It is understood the information was not updated following a change to training routines.
Clubs are required to provide accurate details of training sessions and player whereabouts so that they are available for testing at all times.
The club allegedly failed to ensure that their 'club whereabouts' information was accurate.
City have until 19 January to respond to the charge.
It is understood the information was not updated following a change to training routines.
Okay cheers didn't know that. I may have been a bit to harsh but then but i really do feel we "often" mess up compared to other big clubs.14(D) is literally just an admin problem, calm down.
Helmet Cole
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Jul 2007
- Messages
- 8,054
Glad I'm not the only one cynical enough to take a peep ;-)Fuck off you rag prick.
As see through as a window. You do realise your posting history is easily viewable?
oakiecokie
Well-Known Member
So it is an admin error and nothing to do whatsoever with A.N.Other gone missing.FUCK OFF SKY !!!!Manchester City have been charged by the Football Association for failing to ensure anti-doping officials knew where players were for drugs testing.
Clubs are required to provide accurate details of training sessions and player whereabouts so that they are available for testing at all times.
The club allegedly failed to ensure that their 'club whereabouts' information was accurate.
City have until 19 January to respond to the charge.
It is understood the information was not updated following a change to training routines.
M
M
mat
Guest
He's here he's there
Fucking city everywhere
David Gill David Gill
The FA is bent
The FA is bent
We fucking know it
The FA is bent
Fucking city everywhere
David Gill David Gill
The FA is bent
The FA is bent
We fucking know it
The FA is bent
So we give them the afternoon off, or do an extra session one day, so the FA make a big deal about shouting as loudly as they can that we are drug cheats. Sounds about rightManchester City have been charged by the Football Association for failing to ensure anti-doping officials knew where players were for drugs testing.
Clubs are required to provide accurate details of training sessions and player whereabouts so that they are available for testing at all times.
The club allegedly failed to ensure that their 'club whereabouts' information was accurate.
City have until 19 January to respond to the charge.
It is understood the information was not updated following a change to training routines.
geoff clipp
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 Jul 2010
- Messages
- 1,389
This doesn't sound too serious. Here's an idea though, rather than blaming everyone else for our misfortunes, why don't we actually get our house in order?
Supposing we are being unfairly targeted (I don't think we are), unless we're going to prove it or put solicitors on the case, the only thing we're in control with is how we conduct ourselves. It isn't that big an ask is it really to maintain our paperwork properly and instruct our players to not question the integrity of referees on instagram? The rules might well be pathetic but these are rule breaches nonetheless and easily avoidable. We need to sort it out rather than take on a victim mentality every time we needlessly fuck up.
Supposing we are being unfairly targeted (I don't think we are), unless we're going to prove it or put solicitors on the case, the only thing we're in control with is how we conduct ourselves. It isn't that big an ask is it really to maintain our paperwork properly and instruct our players to not question the integrity of referees on instagram? The rules might well be pathetic but these are rule breaches nonetheless and easily avoidable. We need to sort it out rather than take on a victim mentality every time we needlessly fuck up.
Yes, why don't you think that?Are you an actual City fan?
Fuck off you rag prick.
As see through as a window. You do realise your posting history is easily viewable?
Cheers mate. Youre welcome to check it out.