bluwes
Well-Known Member
Yes, that's my understanding basically. We paid smeone a lot of money to help neutralise that.
You could do with explaining it a bit more on the 93;20 podcast with a massive "Allegedly" at the beginning
Yes, that's my understanding basically. We paid smeone a lot of money to help neutralise that.
Yes, that's my understanding basically. We paid smeone a lot of money to help neutralise that.
So you are saying some one paid city to lose ?In the Champions league semi against Real Madrid we only needed a goal to put us in the final.
My friend and I still wonder to this day why Pellegrini didn't throw everything at RM for the last 20 minutes or so. We both felt that we might as well get beaten by 3 as to meekly surrender the chance to get in the final , a final which we probably would have won!
Then there's the inexplicable performance in the FA CUP Final against Wigan....
So many odd results in so many matches, it makes you wonder .....!
Both matches have a common denominator.In the Champions league semi against Real Madrid we only needed a goal to put us in the final.
My friend and I still wonder to this day why Pellegrini didn't throw everything at RM for the last 20 minutes or so. We both felt that we might as well get beaten by 3 as to meekly surrender the chance to get in the final , a final which we probably would have won!
Then there's the inexplicable performance in the FA CUP Final against Wigan....
So many odd results in so many matches, it makes you wonder .....!
So you are saying some one paid city to lose ?
Do you mind if I ask what you mean by neutralise? As in paid them to specifically not cheat, or to help certain situations go in our favour for the sake of balance?Yes, that's my understanding basically. We paid smeone a lot of money to help neutralise that.
Yes, that's my understanding basically. We paid smeone a lot of money to help neutralise that.
First thing you see when you click that link is this guy's book for sale...