City launch legal action against the Premier League | City win APT case (pg901)

Yeah but it’s already £65m a year and we’ve only missed out on 2 years because of this rule. We won’t be able to claim the full 800 and then renew with Etihad a week later.

I guess where it’d get really interesting is if we said we couldn’t sign player X or had to sell player Y because we were missing the extra £15m a year….
I’m not sure moving Philipps on will wash though ;)
 
Has anyone got a DailyMail account and can read this?

The comments are free and an interesting read!


How Arsenal, Liverpool and Man United's plot to take down Man City spectacularly backfired and now puts THEM in the crosshairs, reveals MIKE KEEGAN​

  • Seismic ruling could have major financial and sporting implications for the clubs that gave evidence against the Premier League champions
  • Join Mail+ for more exclusive scoops, in-depth reporting and analysis from around the top flight
By Mike Keegan

Published: 14:18, 7 October 2024 | Updated: 16:48, 7 October 2024
 
But when you look at the aim of each side, there has been only one winner. And the fallout from this, because of the verdict, is going to be a fucking nightmare for the PL. What clubs will vote for amended rules that, whilst lawful, cause them an issue?
Yep, the more you think about it, the less likely it would be that PSR rules will even exist in a short while.

As the saying goes, Turkeys don't vote for Christmas !
 
It’s clear Kroenke and Arsenal have jumped ahead of the Glazer’s and United, and J.W.Henry and Liverpool, as the main culprits of this long and drawn out attack and campaign against City.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.