pride in battle
Well-Known Member
I take it he doesn't like City ?Has anyone checked if John Bishop is still alive?
I take it he doesn't like City ?Has anyone checked if John Bishop is still alive?
I’m not sure moving Philipps on will wash though ;)Yeah but it’s already £65m a year and we’ve only missed out on 2 years because of this rule. We won’t be able to claim the full 800 and then renew with Etihad a week later.
I guess where it’d get really interesting is if we said we couldn’t sign player X or had to sell player Y because we were missing the extra £15m a year….
Has anyone got a DailyMail account and can read this?
The comments are free and an interesting read!
Revealed: How Arsenal and United plot to take down City backfired
MIKE KEEGAN: One word, delivered by the three experienced and former high-ranking retired judges on the panel, screamed out. The rules are 'unlawful'. This was a victory for City.www.dailymail.co.uk
How Arsenal, Liverpool and Man United's plot to take down Man City spectacularly backfired and now puts THEM in the crosshairs, reveals MIKE KEEGAN
By Mike Keegan
- Seismic ruling could have major financial and sporting implications for the clubs that gave evidence against the Premier League champions
- Join Mail+ for more exclusive scoops, in-depth reporting and analysis from around the top flight
Published: 14:18, 7 October 2024 | Updated: 16:48, 7 October 2024
Yep, the more you think about it, the less likely it would be that PSR rules will even exist in a short while.But when you look at the aim of each side, there has been only one winner. And the fallout from this, because of the verdict, is going to be a fucking nightmare for the PL. What clubs will vote for amended rules that, whilst lawful, cause them an issue?
Yes but it will be applied differently by the Panel as there won't be any time-barring in place.
I take it he doesn't like City ?