City launch legal action against the Premier League | City win APT case (pg901)

[TedofChume]

Has anyone got a DailyMail account and can read this?

The comments are free and an interesting read!

Revealed: How Arsenal and United plot to take down City backfired

MIKE KEEGAN: One word, delivered by the three experienced and former high-ranking retired judges on the panel, screamed out. The rules are 'unlawful'. This was a victory for City.

www.dailymail.co.uk

How Arsenal, Liverpool and Man United's plot to take down Man City spectacularly backfired and now puts THEM in the crosshairs, reveals MIKE KEEGAN​

• Seismic ruling could have major financial and sporting implications for the clubs that gave evidence against the Premier League champions
• Join Mail+ for more exclusive scoops, in-depth reporting and analysis from around the top flight

By Mike Keegan

Published: 14:18, 7 October 2024 | Updated: 16:48, 7 October 2024

Found it:

Revealed: How Arsenal, Liverpool and Man United’s plot to take down Man City spectacularly backfired and now puts them in the crosshairs – Sport.com

Sport.com.co brings you live scores, match results, league standings, upcoming football events and player ratings from the top football leagues and competitions.

www.sport.com.co

 

[WestGorton]

It's 11 men against 11 kicking a bag of wind between two ends and it's ended up in this. However it's better than war.

 

[BlueMoonRisin’]

Looks like we are keeping all our trophies after all. So what's the next load of shit we will be accused of having done ?

Cold chips at HT 6 seasons ago.

 

[bridgeno1]

Nothing against you personally. We're just a bit miffed that while we have been growing our club organically based on increasing revenues due to success on the pitch your owners have been financially doping pumping money into arsenal in the form of interest free 'loans'. Coupled with your dubious links to Emirates this is middle east sports washing at its worst. The game is gone.

I believe City voted in favour of these shareholder loans originally. In the latest case they claimed that allowing these but not reviewing the PL's revised APT approval process provided an unfair advantage to clubs whose owners were bankrolling them.

And that's fair enough, pretty sure none of us are getting a mortgage from a bank at 0% any time soon.

 

[levets]

We’re all wrong. According to the CAF we only won 2 sponsorship complaints, and lost everything else.

We won on SEVEN key issues. https://archive.ph/8lzob

 

[LangleyBlue1970]

I am so proud of the club tonight.

 

[Tevez City]

What a wonderful day

 

[Prestwich_Blue]

That was an equity purchase as part of the 25% ownership acquisition.

There is a reason why United floated the stock: it allows them to continually pump money in to the Glazers' pockets, via either stock offerings, equity-backed loans, or percentage ownership sales.

This is far more accurate than your version.

 

[MadchesterCity]

I wouldn't piss on him if he was on fire, Scouse tosser.

I would but only if I was crapping at the same time

 

[Time will pass me by]

Yes, 14 clubs will be required to vote in favour of the proposed changed rules. This puts the PL in an impossible position-they need a minimum of 14 clubs to agree to change the rules so they comply with the law (as ludicrous as that sounds) and most clubs won't want a change because it will mean they fail PSR (equally ludicrous) they are fuked!

It is almost beautiful