City launch legal action against the Premier League | City win APT case (pg901)

[bridgeno1]

Nothing against you personally. We're just a bit miffed that while we have been growing our club organically based on increasing revenues due to success on the pitch your owners have been financially doping pumping money into arsenal in the form of interest free 'loans'. Coupled with your dubious links to Emirates this is middle east sports washing at its worst. The game is gone.

I believe City voted in favour of these shareholder loans originally. In the latest case they claimed that allowing these but not reviewing the PL's revised APT approval process provided an unfair advantage to clubs whose owners were bankrolling them.

And that's fair enough, pretty sure none of us are getting a mortgage from a bank at 0% any time soon.

 

[levets]

We’re all wrong. According to the CAF we only won 2 sponsorship complaints, and lost everything else.

We won on SEVEN key issues. https://archive.ph/8lzob

 

[LangleyBlue1970]

I am so proud of the club tonight.

 

[Tevez City]

What a wonderful day

 

[Prestwich_Blue]

That was an equity purchase as part of the 25% ownership acquisition.

There is a reason why United floated the stock: it allows them to continually pump money in to the Glazers' pockets, via either stock offerings, equity-backed loans, or percentage ownership sales.

This is far more accurate than your version.

 

[MadchesterCity]

I wouldn't piss on him if he was on fire, Scouse tosser.

I would but only if I was crapping at the same time

 

[Time will pass me by]

Yes, 14 clubs will be required to vote in favour of the proposed changed rules. This puts the PL in an impossible position-they need a minimum of 14 clubs to agree to change the rules so they comply with the law (as ludicrous as that sounds) and most clubs won't want a change because it will mean they fail PSR (equally ludicrous) they are fuked!

It is almost beautiful

 

[bobbyowenquiff]

I’ve been looking on RAWK. They are sick that the entire media are being paid by us

So we have paid off the CAS judges and now the PL panel, all the auditors we have had for 15 years, all our sponsors, all our senior managers, the entire global media. Presumably it’s all part of a grand conspiracy involving Bill Gates and David Ike. The scousers need to keep taking the tablets.

 

[Mazzarelli's Swiss Cheese]

I believe City voted in favour of these shareholder loans originally. In the latest case they claimed that allowing these but not reviewing the PL's revised APT approval process provided an unfair advantage to clubs whose owners were bankrolling them.

And that's fair enough, pretty sure none of us are getting a mortgage from a bank at 0% any time soon.

It's just a bit galling that while we have been doing things the right way based on historical success, arsenal have basically been trying to buy the league title. I think everything you have won in the last few years is tainted and should have an asterisk next to it.
For demonstration purposes here is a picture of your titles next to an asterisk:

*

 

[LesBleuMiserable]

Is there any suggestion of why they’ve done that? Makes no sense at face value

Probably embargoed…? Give parties time to reflect before going public?