City launch legal action against the Premier League | City win APT case (pg901)

[Bluearmy]

Hopefully it’s a sell out and he’s lynched

Just bought 5 at the front. That show wont finish !!!

 

[domalino]

Thats me told @Coatigan

 

[slbsn]

Is it not that loans can be repaid, equity can’t be withdrawn?

Very rare for any club to repay one of these owner loans. Liverpool did but think that was interest bearing. Interest free loans are almost always quasi equity in football. And of course, dividends can be paid if there is excess cash

 

[cheekybids]

This is just giving us a little sample of how immense the piss boiling is going to be when found not guilty next spring, it's going to be glorious

View attachment 134310

Concocting a plan of ignoring us whilst talking about us on our own thread :)

 

[BringBackSwales]

Is there any suggestion of why they’ve done that? Makes no sense at face value

Clearly they have waited until the international break

 

[SebastianBlue]

This is far more accurate than your version.

Huh?

Edit: Ha, missed your modification. Very good!

 

[JASR]

Read my posts, I specifically used the phrases 'what I've heard' and 'it's just as likely to be bollocks as not'.

I'm far from an expert on the charges and to be honest have no real interest in it. I'm pretty certain if City are found guilty they won't be relegated though as that would be commercial suicide on the part of the PL if they boot out its best team at a moment where there's now 40m Americans tuning in to certain games not to mention the massive worldwide interest in the PL.

That's not me being an expert on football finance but is based on decades of working in large enterprises who value profit above all and knowing that turkeys don't vote for Xmas. On this point I'm absolutely bloody certain.

What I’ve heard is that Margot Robbie is desperate for threesome with me & Mrs JASR.

That’s bollox, clearly. Based on hope, not facts.


It doesn’t matter what job you may have, it doesn’t matter what team you support, what matters is facts.

You can’t attempt to dress it up by saying ‘what I’ve heard…’ because it’s been pointed out on numerous occasions in replies to you to actually read impartial facts (eg the CAS verdict), which directly and completely demolish your ‘what I’ve heard…’ spiel.

If you reply in the same vein or post similar again, I’ll have to report you as a WUM, which would be a shame as Ric would like more ‘other’ fans as posters… but you really do yourself no favours by repeat spouting bollox.

 

[slbsn]

What happens if the PL don’t get support from enough clubs to implement that particular rule? Can see quite a lot not being particularly happy about it.

They will have to. No real option

 

[jrb]

 

[slbsn]

That talks about RPTs and FMV but not specifically soft loans.

Oh. Given 19/20 agreed to loans being excluded I doubt they worried too much about a challenge