City launch legal action against the Premier League | City win APT case (pg901)

Wow have went through all the pages from 901,and have to say it’s a great day to be a City fan and what the club have shown what’s been essentially going on with these rules and the emails from the premier league to and from other clubs..
Just a shame sections of the media are reporting it as a minor win or premier league victory when this isn’t the case,it’s basically one last Hail Mary from cartel friendly media..
 
There is a huge sports news story to be told here, an independent panel of three well respected retired judges have issued a report and adjudication that suggests that the governing body of one of the most important sports leagues in the world is, at its most generous interpretation, utterly incompetent and chaotic or, much worse, utterly corrupt and in cahoots with a subset of clubs to disort and manipulate the competition. In many ways the fact it was City bringing the action is irrelevant to the real substance of the story.

But instead what we get from.significant portions of the press is the kind of crap Barney Ronay has served up today which has already been called out by multiple posters. The level of sophistry being employed to avoid writing the real story is an indication, with a few honourable exceptions, of just how bankrupt much of what passes for sports journalism in this country these days actually is.
 
Damanino said:
Tomorrow morning in the 115 hearing Pannick has to start with addressing the panel of the APT results. Play the unfair process quote from panel and use it relating to 115. same organization, same process vs same club ...
Click to expand...
We have had this verdict for 2 weeks, it was the PL holding its release back. So we had the results of this case at the start of the other hearing.
 
gordondaviesmoustache said:
Then explain it to me. Please.
Click to expand...

He’s saying that if people want to go after our sponsorships, which equate to not that much in the grand scheme of things, then they should be going even further into the far bigger sums of money procured unlawfully by other clubs through their owners loans, due to how he’s interpeted the judgment.

He’s overreaching but wouldn’t be surprised if he goes all in with it, he’d still be wrong but directing his ire wrongly at someone else rather than us for a change.
 
hi folks wake up to this reassuring news
different time zone

pretty sure someone asked this before on here
but what does this mean to our 115 charges ?

I am guessing it lower the chance that we will be guilty?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.