604. Injunctive relief and damages are also sought. We reserve our jurisdiction to grant such relief. We do not [do] so in this Award because we heard no submissions as to such relief and in any event we consider that the Parties should have the opportunity to consider what, if any, further relief is appropriate in the light of our conclusions.Wasn’t there supposed to be a second case where City could claim compensation? What happened there?
That’s bluemoon for you. Oh and……rag!!
That isn't what the judgment says though.I have and as the key element is that APT breaks actual law and is unlawful. Its like a serial killer being found not guilty of one murder while being found guilty on another twelve.
I'd answer that the odd appearance on Talksport is incredibly unlikely to outweigh the high credibility and career opportunities he'd get from retaining his credibility as a legal counsel and football finance expert by outlining opinions as he sees them based on his years of experience and access to facts.And that is the entire point, it is HIS considered view and that is all, the fact that he chooses to use a appalling excuse of a radio station which has in the past employed stan collymore and mark goldbridge and currently employs gabby agbonlahor and martin keown to voice that opinion somewhat reduces the veracity of that opinion. I get he is a blue and he knows his onions but that does not make him infallible and his opinions above reproach with the best well in the world if a respected surgeon decided to express his medical opinion in the beano you would have to question why.
Why? He fights our corner for free and is independent. If we pay him we are a few quid down and he is regarded as biased.Pay the man it would be worth it to have Martin Samuels on side