ayrshire_blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 May 2008
- Messages
- 6,110
Be aware that claims of a PL win are linked to this:
He added: "While it is true that MCFC did not succeed with every point that it ran in its legal challenge, the club did not need to prove that the APT rules are unlawful for lots of different reasons. It is enough that they are unlawful for one reason."
In reality the PL ‘wins’ were worthless because City only needed to show the rules were unlawful for a single season. That some of City’s claims of the rules being unlawful were thrown out means absolutely nothing.
Here’s an example:
Haaland has 5 one on ones with the keeper. The keeper saves 4 but Haaland scores 1. To win the game Haaland had to score just 1 of his 5 attempts. The keeper can claim he ‘won’ 4 but ultimately the game goes to Haaland.
So, what you're saying, in conclusion...is that we got the three points but we're probably better going back to the false 9?