But the story still does not mention the Judges’ verdict. It includes a phrase that says City had some complaints upheld including two aspects of APT rules which were found to be unlawful. No mention of the seven allegations upheld and spelt out in stark terms by the Judges themselves. Just more dishonest coverage from Roan.BBC Head still failing to lead the story regarding the catastrophic failing of the PL. But not a bad article publicising our letter sent to every PL club emphasising our victory and how unlawful the PL are and calling out Masters. BBC can’t resist a few bitter inputs but on balance the article is a damming of the PL even though it is reported as in the words of ourselves and not their own editorial opinion
Too fucking late- the red cartel are the ones who should've been careful. Don't fuck with Sheikh Mansour and Khaldoon you bent bastards
The very idea of "winning" in a case like this is a little bit bonkers.
FIFA claimed a "win" the other day about the Diarra case too. Everybody always claims a win all the time. Ultimately there is no winner and loser, theres just some rules to be tweaked and everything carries on as usual.
If people can't accept that winning and losing don't really exist in a case against the PL then they're going to be very annoyed when the 115 judgement comes out. Nobody will win that either, despite both sides claiming that they did.
We are a shareholder of the PL. There is no us and them, there is just us.
Verily, the words 'emergency meeting' always seem to have that calming effect on everyone in every case they are uttered.But according to Dan Roan the PL are relaxed about the APT verdict.