Plays By Sense Of Smell
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 4 Sep 2011
- Messages
- 11,093
Basically a 'STFU' shot across the bows...
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
City launch legal action against the Premier League | City win APT case (pg901)
- Thread starter denislawsbackheel
- Start date
If you look at the intro to CAS, our lawyers are billed as representing CFG. I expect the same is true here.Actually that's more accurate.
By taking on the talksport gig it's inevitable he would open himself up to a level of scrutiny and criticism that he would otherwise not face.To be honest, I find both the criticism and deification of Slbsn a bit much. However, he does caveat what he says (see para #3).
Hopefully he's big enough to handle it.
give it to gordon
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Nov 2013
- Messages
- 17,611
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Too fucking late- the red cartel are the ones who should've been careful. Don't fuck with Sheikh Mansour and Khaldoon you bent bastards
City need to be careful, what the fuck. Why are these clubs so keen to stay in bed with a league that uses illegal rules
Too fucking late- the red cartel are the ones who should've been careful. Don't fuck with Sheikh Mansour and Khaldoon you bent bastards
He’s certainly happy to give the premier league far more credit than they deserve whilst playing down any of City’s points so he’s a bit of a dick whoever he follows.Christian may be an Arsenal fan I suppose....
In the words of Orwell, some animals are more equal than others, and the dippers are an especially special animal Afterall.Why “including” dippers and spuds? I thought all members were equally entitled
i kne albert davy
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Aug 2010
- Messages
- 11,270
I bet the cheeky cheating fuckers don't want an independent regulator.
City told them right at the beginning that the rules were unlawful. The twats should have listened.The levels of misdirection are off the scale.
If you want rules to be effective then don’t frame them in a way that’s fucking unlawful.
Dribble
Well-Known Member
This is the key. It's my understanding that in order to compete in the PL, the 20 stakeholders agree that no litigation against the PL can be taken against the league in the UK or European law courts, unless it concerns the actual complaints process, but NOT the substance of the complaint.The question I have is that if the tribunal have found certain aspects of the PSR and APT rules to be unlawful, how did this come to pass ?
The PL had sought legal advice before drafting the rules , were they implemented despite the legal advice or was the legal advice simply wrong
It all points to a set of rules that have been curated and pushed through by a certain number of clubs specifically targeted at City, and probably more prominently, Newcastle
This surely has a bearing on the 115 case , setting our stall out that there are rules specifically targeted at our club that were unlawful
This essentially makes the PL judge, jury & executioner, hence why the Red Top Mafia can unduly influence PL rules to their advantage, & there's nothing the other stakeholders can do about it.
I sense City were very serious when Khaldoon warned in 2014/15 that we'd reluctantly "take a pinch", but the next time they come at us, we'd rather spend £30m on the world's best lawyers, than pay UEFA or the PL another penny in fines.
I'm fuckin glad we've taken the gloves off, & put the knuckle-dusters & bovver boots on!