Maybe all clubs should be allowed to agree on everyone’s sponsorship who the fuck do the PL think they are? What’s to stop them saying sponsorship of bog rolls at United is worth more than City, fucking scandalous
Yeah, it might be,It'll be bigger than big it will be MASSIVE!
View attachment 134409
noNot even if he reads dead fast?
I believe the club statement seemed as though we were fairly happy.Really? I don’t think we’ll be happy that we only got the decisions on the two sponsorship deals set aside for the reasons we did. I think we’d have wanted something a bit more substantive around some of the core challenges around the APT rules too.
Again, it all depends what happens next to really be able to contextualise it into wins and losses though, both in terms of how they deal with anything done to date and also how quickly the clubs agree to new lawful rules.
Neither of those will be easy and in that initial context, I’d absolutely describe it as more a win for us.
Your view differs from City's then. The club don't object to the PL determining FMV what they object to is not being allowed access to the benchmarking data they use to determine said FMV.Maybe all clubs should be allowed to agree on everyone’s sponsorship who the fuck do the PL think they are? What’s to stop them saying sponsorship of bog rolls at United is worth more than City, fucking scandalous
I believe the club statement seemed as though we were fairly happy.
He did call the database stuff over a week ago@slbsn did say on here yesterday, that like it or not, panja is connected and has good sources
I was until I read this fucking thread!! :-)I wouldn’t expect anything else and I’m sure we are fairly happy :)
Ye because they could be lying, they’re a set of cunts end of.Your view differs from City's then. The club don't object to the PL determining FMV what they object to is not being allowed access to the benchmarking data they use to determine said FMV.