sir baconface
Well-Known Member
They also found procedural reasons, which would also need to be corrected. Then surely the whole new, impeccably drafted package would need to be voted in properly rather than anything prior being reinstated?Thanks Vic but it says….
“that the APT Rules are unlawful on account of being in breach of sections 2 and 18 of the Competition Act 1998 because they exclude from their scope shareholder loans and for no other reason;”
That says to me that if the shareholder loans area is corrected then it becomes lawful as they state that is the only reason?