Can anyone post it from behind paywall?If you read articles by the great Martin Samuel in the Times this week especially today's we definitely won
Can anyone post it from behind paywall?If you read articles by the great Martin Samuel in the Times this week especially today's we definitely won
Maybe Bobby, that director will be expecting a knock on his door if what he did was illegal, I dont know if it is, someone might. This house of cards is looking shaky and if someone gets lifted it will be spectacular, all the red shirts and others fighting between themselves saying it wasn't us. One thing you can be sure of is our owners are no fools as many people are going to find out in the coming months.It is shocking and depressing that the Newcastle story is getting virtually no coverage. As you say it's not a conspiracy theory. The evidence for the APT case shows that one (redacted) Club Director orchestrated a group of ten other club directors who then colluded with Richard Masters to introduce an emergency amendment to the rules to block investment at Newcastle United. What did the other nine clubs (including City and Newcastle) think about this collusion? How can any organisation enable a partial group of its shareholders, supported by the CEO, to actively inflict commercial damage on another member? Is this activity even legal? Who is going to investigate what is happening behind closed doors at the Premier League?
Everton’s shareholder debt is all stadium related isn’t it? Don’t think it’s even being factored in in the deal to sell the club, so will likely just be written off in equity.You assuming Everton will still back us? Will they still given that they have the most shareholder debt.
Southampton West Ham and Fulham have no shareholder loans either so they won't be affected by the future interest payments.
It not that difficult to write levy instead of wasting ink on redacting.
FFP is only needed at Euro level. If you get into Europe, you comply with UEFA FFP to ensure that no single league becomes too powerful and runs roughshod over all others, which arguably the PL could do without FFP. It means the likes of City, Arsenal etc do have some restrictions on their spend. No issues with that.I agree actually, with some controls over debt and community assets. Let's not forget clubs in Europe need to comply with UEFA FFP even if all the PL FFP is scrapped, giving other clubs the chance to develop through investment.
We do but others need to think a bit!
Apologies if this has already been posted but here is another fabulous article by Martin Samuel....
’Tis but a scratch – Premier League are like Python’s Black Knight
Need help understanding the claims and counter-claims over the Manchester City verdict? Then look no further than ‘Monty Python and the Holy Grail’ …www.thetimes.com
Saw that too. Impressive answer. I’m sure he hadn’t been primed!Just caught the back end of a interview with a guy from Etihad on sky business news segment.
The interviewer asked him about the city sponsorship, he replied it's brought enormous exposure to Etihad, even in places like Brazil, said we are massive over there.
Well worth 8 million....I mean 60 million a year.
Everybody is so suspicious these days.. :-)Saw that too. Impressive answer. I’m sure he hadn’t been primed!