Really ! Was there a need to put it as City's really expensively assembled group of lawyers convinced the panel, no mention that the premier leagues expensively assembled group of lawyers failing to convince them of anything.I don’t see the issue as such with the article
Watched a few air shows there.Can I just say that I have never worked at Woodford?
This is the narrative they put out. City, who have infinite financial resources, are prepared to spend whatever it takes on legal manoeuvres in order to kill any restrictions on spending.Really ! Was there a need to put it as City's really expensively assembled group of lawyers convinced the panel, no mention that the premier leagues expensively assembled group of lawyers failing to convince them of anything.
Did the Trafford team get a much larger deal off their shirt sponsors? Surely a midtable team should not be getting more than the Dips ?Liverpool have set up a £60 million shirt deal with Adidas yet the premier league knocked us back on the Etihad deal which covers so much more. Surely this is more ammunition for the club.
The PL managed to successfully convince the independent panel of KCs that the acted .....Really ! Was there a need to put it as City's really expensively assembled group of lawyers convinced the panel, no mention that the premier leagues expensively assembled group of lawyers failing to convince them of anything.
Written by that slimy toad Rob Harris - why am I not surprised?big clue at the top of the email
How Man City's fight to fend off spending restrictions is ripping the Premier League apart
Premier League clubs have held talks to reconfigure rules related to losses and income - with the meeting necessary after City's lawyers convinced a panel that aspects of the regulations were in breach of competition law.news.sky.com
"with the meeting necessary after City's lawyers convinced a panel that aspects of the regulations were in breach of competition law"Written by that slimy toad Rob Harris - why am I not surprised?