Matt Diablo
Well-Known Member
Lets all pray, chant or whatever this shit doesn't go on for ever!
Not being pedantic but they won't "owe" it, a PIK would be applied to the accounts to reflect the commercial value of the loan with regards to APT rules.There 350m loan is 0% so they bring the loan to be fair market they'll owe a lot more plus if they back date it
Someone needs to inform Soriano that we have 115 charges of financial fraud staring us in the face. No point planning for the future, we should be planning for our death.This is a great read, onwards amd upwards :-)
I was enthralled by Ferran Soriano’s 8-minute talk as he laid out Man City plans
The Manchester City CEO spoke ahead of the club’s latest title-winning documentary.www.manchesterworld.uk
I don't agree with this at all.
Nothing in the APT case could save City if they had faked their biggest contracts for a decade and then lied repeatedly to the outside world including auditors and multiple other parties.
We always knew why the APTs were introduced (for Newcastle and because nobody believed certain parties were not related and/or related was not a sufficiently strong test). There was nothing revelatory there.
If there was a point here City would not have waited to the Feb 2024 changes before launching their challenge. The APT challenge specifically followed amendments that City warned went too far. They did not challenge 2021 APT either then or after Feb 2023.
The 115 breaches are not about being related or fair value in the absence of there being concealment of some relevant facts (such as outright lies about whether Etihad is related). The idea the PL could undermine the auditors over 14 years (not to mention UEFA and CAS) as to the related party aspects of that is not plausible. And those matters would not be challengeable now in any event in my view due to statute of limitations. They are about serious allegations of false accounting that even if the whole PSR had been found unlawful would not save City if the allegations were proved.
In short, construing this connection in this way is wrong. Any connection is far more subtle.
PL is a great competition. Most of the leagues in Europe are already 2 team leagues at best. Fans all around the world will either watch the ESL or the PL, whichever is better.The ESL would only become a success if the best teams are in it and that assumes that there is no more lucrative alternative. If FIFA came up with, say, a Club World Cup, where the prize money dwarfed that of the ESL, even if the clubs didn't follow, the players soon would. And that would kill the ESL.
I see a golf-style schism heading football's way.
This new CL format is as dull as dishwater to most of us. After 8 rounds of games no team of any significance to the latter stages of the competition will drop out. Somehow they are managing to sell it as an exciting "new format".I think it would be massive initially but i dont think the interest would be sustainable, like i have said previously the big games between these teams are a rarity so they garner interest when they become the norm the interest will go away its destruction through over saturation, it happens with alot of products take prime as the most recent example when it was rare people were fighting over it paying ridiculous prices per bottle then they flooded the market and now they cant give it away.
....almost TWICE what HH Sheikh Mansour paid for all of City.Brighton have enjoyed £373 million of interest free shareholder loans.