Was it 16-4, or did some clubs abstain?City
Villa
Newcastle
Forest
Clubs who voted against. (Ben Rumsby, telegraph).
Was it 16-4, or did some clubs abstain?City
Villa
Newcastle
Forest
Clubs who voted against. (Ben Rumsby, telegraph).
it all depends on whats in the changes.
we say wait until the outcome of the tribunal, but maybe the new rules take that into account.
i await our resident expert analysis of the new rules to help me understand what exactly has been voted in.
Let's not forget that Everton and Wolves were effectively told to vote for the changes because of shareholder loans and PSR concerns. And they call us corrupt. Pot, kettle and black are three words to describe the PL's actions. Again bullying from the red cartel and it's arsewipe Spurs in action.Was it 16-4, or did some clubs abstain?
I'd hardly call it a defeat if City go on to successfully challenge them again. Fucking stupid slap-headed ****!
Was it 16-4, or did some clubs abstain?
Most clubs vote in their own self-interest, not against us as such. The shareholder loan issue swung it for a number of clubs.16-4 is a right hammering.
Its not just the cartel clubs that hate us, its the vast majority