City launch legal action against the Premier League | City win APT case (pg901)

[Lord Blue]

i would expect City to await the outcome of the tribunal, otherwise we look daft for ignoring our own words.

 

[halfcenturyup]

16-4 is a right hammering.
Its not just the cartel clubs that hate us, its the vast majority

Not if the 16 have got it wrong. Then it just proves the vast majority are run by idiots. But we knew that already.

The real battle is still coming, I think.

 

[paulchapo]

It means nothing if their rules are once more deemed illegal, just another court case. I hope we will n it and claim damages from the sixteen cunts who voted against us.

 

[CC1]

16-4 is a right hammering.
Its not just the cartel clubs that hate us, its the vast majority

Depends how the rules have been redrafted- although obviously we wanted them completely rewriting as opposed to a soft amendment. If shareholder loans have been treated “gently “ compared with other APT then it’s back to court - unless the redraft doesn’t satisfy the recommendations in the tribunal report & then we start again

 

[WestGorton]

Starting to quite like Villa again

 

[Blue Maverick]

They can vote for what they want but is it legal? Am I right in thinking the tribunal has not delivered its verdict yet?

 

[halfcenturyup]

i would expect City to await the outcome of the tribunal, otherwise we look daft for ignoring our own words.

City will stop the PL enforcing the new rules until the tribunal gives its judgment (and, hopefully after), I imagine.

 

[dadnlad]

hope pep got tin hat on at press conference

 

[CC1]

Most clubs vote in their own self-interest, not against us as such. The shareholder loan issue swung it for a number of clubs.

Exactly. Contrary to media claims that all the other PL clubs hate us - they’re just looking after themselves which is why we need the “independent” tribunal ruling

 

[mcfcpride]