City launch legal action against the Premier League | City win APT case (pg901)

Does it matter what other clubs think either in favour or against what we are saying?

If it’s judged to be unlawful it will be stopped otherwise it won’t

Also why am I not surprised that sky sports in the space of 24 hours have gone from saying this is nothing to do with the main allegations to saying they are intrinsically linked
 
jrb said:
City aren’t alone. It’s a start. And it sends a message to Masters and the PL.

EXCLUSIVE BY MIKE KEEGAN: At least three clubs have sympathy for Manchester City's position after they declared war on the Premier League over spending rules. Mail Sport understands that Newcastle among those who believe the champions have valid concerns ahead of a hearing on Monday at which City will attempt to get rules that limit how much companies linked to club owners can spend on sponsorship deals thrown out. While only one of the group - thought to be Chelsea - has provided a statement which challenges the updated rules on associated party transactions (APT), it is understood that Villa co-owner, the Egyptian billionaire Nassef Sawiris, is close to City chairman Khaldoon Al Mubarak and that he shares frustrations over imposed limits on spending.
Click to expand...

Why did he need to mention the Villa guy is Egyptian?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.