City launch legal action against the Premier League | City win APT case (pg901)

Rags v Dippers eh? When the PL viewing figures coming out of America show its City who are the big draw out there. Its just another example of how big and mighty those two clubs think they are. City's Instagram followers eclipse Liverpool's, and we are gaining fast on the shower of shit from Trafford. United, living off dominance twenty years ago, Liverpool , a club that relies heavily on YNWA pumped through speakers at the beginning of a game, one fucking title in 30 years. Kids of today don't really give a shit about either club, they want to see breath taking football on the pitch which City serve up season in season out.
fair point, i just picked out what most of the foc would consider to be a big game and well promoted, i didnt really think it through in any amount of detail, i was just making a point that i cant see where it goes from a financial perspective, i guess they are annoyingly trying to do something along the lines of the nfl games in london and germany.
 
fair point, i just picked out what most of the foc would consider to be a big game and well promoted, i didnt really think it through in any amount of detail, i was just making a point that i cant see where it goes from a financial perspective, i guess they are annoyingly trying to do something along the lines of the nfl games in london and germany.
No problem mate, both of those clubs would fucking eat themselves if they were made out of chocolate.
 
Rags v Dippers eh? When the PL viewing figures coming out of America show its City who are the big draw out there. Its just another example of how big and mighty those two clubs think they are. City's Instagram followers eclipse Liverpool's, and we are gaining fast on the shower of shit from Trafford. United, living off dominance twenty years ago, Liverpool , a club that relies heavily on YNWA pumped through speakers at the beginning of a game, one fucking title in 30 years. Kids of today don't really give a shit about either club, they want to see breath taking football on the pitch which City serve up season in season out.
You just know it would be those two though. Give them the opportunity to flog their gear to 120,000 idiots and boost their coffers even more.
 
Because their objectives are different but what they all want often meets. The clubs at the bottom want to be able to invest and stay in the PL; the clubs in the middle don't want the bottom clubs investing and catching them up with them; the clubs below City either want to invest to catch up to City, or just want to cripple City so they can catch up without investing (in either case, they don't want any newcomers investing and overtaking them). So you get turkeys voting for more food, but then Christmas comes along.

There is nothing wrong with a two thirds majority, of course. The problem lies in which votes are put before the meetings in the first place. Someone needs to be filtering out proposals for votes which are not in the interest of the league in the long term. Proposals which are legally suspect, for one, and proposals that restrict investment, for another. It's Masters' job. And he is piss awful at it.
i read twitter (i know) the argument but you're team voted for it or main one 14 voted so majority want it, what isnt mentioned is how many of 14 are yank owned so ganging up
 
Bumped into a Bar Codes supporter yesterday at work.
Started talking Football and our cause. I need not have gone into detail - he was fully aware and 100% with us.
Just nice to know not everyone is an enemy of Gods own.
Only cos it now suits them. Before their latest owners they were just like the rest. Now they are being screwed over on investment and sponsorships they are starting to understand
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.