The thread title is still fine imo - there were reports that City had secured a "potentially significant victory". Whether or not those reports were true remains to be seen, however.
City launch legal action against the Premier League | City win APT case (pg901)
- Thread starter denislawsbackheel
- Start date
Cobwebcat
Well-Known Member
As you were. Seems Stefan is correct.
yeah whatever !!
Well-Known Member
It'll soon be on sale at the Old Trafford chippy...Vinegar on your chips sir :)
remember arthur mann
Well-Known Member
salfordbluetrue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Jul 2013
- Messages
- 4,000
Now this is the bit that confuses me, City sued over the February changes, not the 2023 changes where they abstained ( i believe ) So did the PL change the rules straight after the February vote and publish it? or did they wait until the end of the season to change the rules so it would appear in the new rule book?
If it is the latter then at this point the PL do not need to do anything but postpone after postpone.
Matt Diablo
Well-Known Member
Starters for 10. Not even that we already won 1 case. Nothing has changed. Just one big witch hunt scam . . .
tornandfrayed
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 19 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 405
That sounds as if it was dictated to him by the Premier League PR department
exactly what I was thinking - why would two of the most credible journalists about jump the gun & put their name to something if they didn't genuinely believe there was any truth to it?
Afew on here have seen a couple tweets from Stefan, & shat their pants.
halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 11,377
Oh right, so the Times has now said that the proposed "strengthening" of the rules was to do with access to the database, which is presumably why Panja has concluded that City's limited win is to do with the database and that is why it was withdrawn.
Not sure that follows unless the PL has given information to Liverpool who have leaked. Unlikely to have happened I think. It's the opposite side of the coin to every other news outlet saying City have secured a potentially significant victory based on a withdrawn vote.
Still unsure of the timing of all this. After three months it would be surprisingly unlikely if the judgment was made available to the PL the day before a shareholders' meeting.
Still much more to this story, I think.
Not sure that follows unless the PL has given information to Liverpool who have leaked. Unlikely to have happened I think. It's the opposite side of the coin to every other news outlet saying City have secured a potentially significant victory based on a withdrawn vote.
Still unsure of the timing of all this. After three months it would be surprisingly unlikely if the judgment was made available to the PL the day before a shareholders' meeting.
Still much more to this story, I think.