The judgment states they PL have acted unlawfully, City can seek damages, not hard to work out the winner.
The PL are being at best disingenuous when they state the tribunal ruled APT is needed, City never challenged the overall basis of APT, but how it was aimed at certain clubs, one of which is City.
City only needed to prove one point in law for it to be deemed unlawful, there were seven points it failed on, again easy to work out who has been successful.
The interesting point is where it mentions loans from owners should be in the calculations, can anyone explain how that will work for certain clubs who have such debt?
To be fair, "The World's Greatest Club"™ are trying their best with their performances on the pitch.They should be relegated :)
We could use a 'No more nails' bomb.....We should storm their offices at Salford Quays and super glue ourselves to the doors on every floor.
First of who the fuck asked him or gave him the permission to comment on subject bigger than his mouth? his job is to be a commentator during a match and tell us where the fuck is the ball but instead he goes on non stop about city’s money.We are embarrassed that we won four titles on the bounce in spite of being financially hindered every step of the way by unlawful rules. Embarrassed for the cunts who tried to stitch us up and still failed.
So we have it in black and white that the cunts are racist, trying to stop owners from "gulf States" it's a fucking disgrace the way the Premier League is run, heads should roll after this. And the red cartel have the audacity to call us the cheats.
Fuck em.
Yeah, the bad news needs burying!I wouldn't put it past rags to sack Ten Bob tomorrow to get this out of the headlines.