City launch legal action against the Premier League | City win APT case (pg901)

[JASR]

I'm pretty sure whatever rules they bring in they will be "lawful". The PL can't afford another defeat like this one.

I think any potentially damaging conversation around the PL table will be brought to a swift conclusion by the City representative merely saying ‘I presume there is no need to Pannick’

 

[jamesha]

The cowards haven't opened the comments section, either.

Better write to Barry Took!

 

[jrb]

No surprise.

The 3 Yank owned Red Shirt cartel clubs. Cunts!

No Spurs.

 

[bernard o'silver]

Why do fucking Bournemouth have a big say and interest in this? Sooner they fuck off back to the third tier the better!

Their owner is William P. Foley II , an American ( has to be with a name like that!) . I suspect that could have some bearing on their interest.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

Well colour me shocked.

 

[Blue Llama]

Still claiming they won though hey.We will still be classed as cheats no matter what happens with the 115

That is why we have to push for compensation even if it's only 1p

 

[MikeF]

Jesus, I’ve just heard Simon Stone on 5 live trying to explain it, he can barely speak, the thick twat

 

[Colin Bells Boots]

I wouldn't put it past rags to sack Ten Bob tomorrow to get this out of the headlines.

Still a win win situation !

 

[Crooked_rain]

No surprise.

The 3 Yank owned Red Shirt cartel clubs. Cunts!

No Spurs.

View attachment 134236

Always hated the first 4 in that list

 

[City Raider]

When did this whole owner interest free loans become apparent as something we were challenging? I dont remember ever hearing about this before but it feels like this as significant as anything im reading in all of this.

I dont think it was until our genius lawyers said, hang on, how can these clubs question associated party transactions at the same time as receiving interest free loans from shareholders