City launch legal action against the Premier League | City win APT case (pg901)

[BlueAnorak]

What a suprise (NOT).

If you apply rules that go much further than IFRS accountany rules defining who a related 3rd party is, you'd better make sure it is:
1. Legal.
2. Applied fairly.
3. Doesn't target one or a couple of specific clubs.

They haven't been. City have clearly won on this major point. Everything else is trivial.

IFRS determine international accountacy rules and these ARE incorporated into UK law. The particular issue that the PL catestrophically failed the legal test on here was who is a related 3rd party is.

 

[yeah whatever !!]

 

[Jimmieblue]

Can we sue them now for a huge sum, for putting the reputation of our amazing club into disrepute?

 

[GaudinoMotors]

West Ham... what have you done siding with that shower of cunts.

Is the Grand Alliance showing some cracks?

The class Pep and the club have shown to them, yet they'd rather side with those that seek to keep them permanently in their mid to low table place. It really beggars belief what jealousy can do to people's thinking.

 

[Resurrection Joe...]

 

[RiversideBlue]

Ha ha ha ha ha..etc.

 

[MaineRoadMemories]

Oh how I wish I could've been in Arsenal's Boardroom this morning. Now that APT has to integrate shareholder loans they'll be losing their minds.

Stay humble eh!

 

[Snape]

How long would this news have been under an injunction? It’s surprising, given how many in-depth articles were released so quickly.

 

[WRicko]

Compensation and two new huge sponsorship deals incoming then ?

 

[Bozo]