City launch legal action against the Premier League | City win APT case (pg901)

Ann Peebles* said it best**

I'm gonna tear your play house down,
room by room


* edit. I've now spelt her name correctly. ;-)
**you may also have heard a pale imitation by Paul Young.
 
Last edited:
Exeter Blue I am here said:
That cnut Rob Harris. Last seen asking Pep if he was being paid via a secret account, when we won the double in 2019
Click to expand...

City security should have escorted him out of the room politely and quietly, and then thrown him down the stairs.

Spineless twat hiding behind his journalist's badge.

Out of interest, does anybody know if he has been
" excluded " ala Roan action, as I don't remember hearing his whiny voice.

Slimy Simon is usually the first **** to try and piss Pep off, of course .
 
Prestwich_Blue said:
Reminds me that when Wardle was chairman, Alistair Mackintosh was CEO and Paul Tyrrell was the Communications head. An insider told me that Tyrrell's job was to big-up Mackintosh.

As a result, every article you saw where Mackintosh was mentioned or quoted used the phrase "City's highly-regarded chief executive...". It seems the PL and cartel's media teams have issued a similar instruction to its client journalists that every mention of Manchester City must include "115 charges" somewhere.
Click to expand...
Don’t forget, “expensively assembled lawyers”, or some such similar phrase……
 
Ooof. Made it through the whole sentence;)

Best part and its essence is probably when arbitration panel stated that the exclusion of shareholder loans from the APT rules is at odds with the whole rationale of PSR (Profit and Sustainability Rules) providing the justification that the effect on competition between clubs and the sustainability of a particular club is the same whether the money is received in a transparent manner from the owner or in a non-transparent way from a third party.

Main effect I believe will be, that gratuitous loans from owners or third parties to the clubs are finished. Probably PL need to add to the APT interest verification mechanism.

It has also an impact on 115 case I believe. Its been great counter offensive measure by City, because it shows, that question is not only about violation of rules, but firstly about the question whether those rules are legitimate. And arbitration panel have now more indications that it shall be checked out.
 
johnny crossan said:
I've rejigged that post now as below and sent it as a complaint to SKY before passing it on to OFCOM


Blatantly racist reporting

"Sponsorship deal changes
The concept of ATPs (sic) was introduced to address clubs being able to turn to companies linked to the ownership to bring in sponsorship. How & when they are then assessed at "Fair Market Value" is in dispute - with Abu Dhabi-funded City and Saudi-owned Newcastle, particularly in the sights of rivals and concerns the value of deals could be inflated."
Like US-funded Arsenal, Liverpool, United, Fulham, Bournemouth, Chelsea, Ipswich, Palace, Villa, West Ham, Spurs
or
China funded Wolves,
Thailand funded Leicester,
Greece funded Forest,
Serbia funded Southampton,
Russia funded Everton
Hong Kong funded Brentford & Brighton (bookies)
??
No, it is utterly blatant racist reporting singling out clubs on the basis of ethnicity.

You are clearly in breach of the Ofcom Code are you going to publish an immediate apology?
Click to expand...
A reply from a person! (Promising a reply - I''ll keep you posted)
Untitled.png
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.