The 115 charges and these current Associated Party issues are tiresome and wear you down after a while. My love for the game is wavering and the constant attacks by the media are draining. I hope I am wrong, but I'm not confident we are going to succeed in the revision of Associated Party transaction rule.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
City launch legal action against the Premier League | Unconfirmed reports that City have secured "potentially significant victory" (p 808)
- Thread starter denislawsbackheel
- Start date
Hi Schfc6 how have you deduced that a third of clubs will have to sell players? Because the rules are to be backdated?
I don’t follow.
'Hang it in the Louvre'. Yea it was an oldie but felt apt to re-use given all these flying media metaphors.Love this reference...even more so since I saw the real thing (minus Jack) in the Louvre just the other month....it is indeed a masterpiece!
halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 11,139
money, money, money at the end of the day you can only put 11 out on the pitch and that is a simple fact, a product of our academy dragged us to the title this year, that wasnt money, a rag youth product scored the winner for them in the fa cup that wasnt money, thats all these fuckwits are focused on and obviously it bloody helps but it is definitely not the only thing.
Gobshite!
Take those two on and you take me on as well ;)
I love you and want to have your children.
I don't think the ATP case will go our way - but at least it's being challenged. It SHOULD be challenged if it is anti-competitive.The 115 charges and these current Associated Party issues are tiresome and wear you down after a while. My love for the game is wavering and the constant attacks by the media are draining. I hope I am wrong, but I'm not confident we are going to succeed in the revision of Associated Party transaction rule.
I'm not letting a few client journalists and the sheep they attract to interfere with the enjoyment of being the best there is.
oi its knobhead to you sirGobshite!
I love you and want to have your children.
Plavivoice
Member
- Joined
- 14 Mar 2015
- Messages
- 18
@KS55 - I think it is clear that there is already, in general, outside of the current issue, a wide media agenda against us.What would you do with this critique when complete or is it just for academic purposes?How did he do this? I am considering writing a critique of the press treatment of City and would welcome any info you have.
Churchlawtonblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Dec 2013
- Messages
- 14,345
Sorry I didn't realise you were quoting Sky sports.I don’t follow.
- No provision for wider release but maybe they will agree to that
I'm sure if it goes against City, it will leak to The Times from one of the parties....
There is a certain madness to the Premier League that I am sure the City lawyers can exploit.
1) Fair value for transfer fees. Should Liverpool be allowed to sell Coutinho for £125 Million when everyone knew he was not worth it?
2) Fair value for transfer fees again. The Saudis were, apparently, willing to pay £200 Million for 31yr old Mo Salah. Seriously? So it's alright for the Red Top sides to get inflated sums but seemingly not ok for City?
3) Is this the first time in football history when a controlling sporting body wants to lower the quality of their sport? Sick of seeing Tiger Woods, Roger Federer, Ronnie O'Sullivan, Usain Bolt, Frankel, Red Rum, etc win. Why don't we just ban them? Let's just ban excellence.
1) Fair value for transfer fees. Should Liverpool be allowed to sell Coutinho for £125 Million when everyone knew he was not worth it?
2) Fair value for transfer fees again. The Saudis were, apparently, willing to pay £200 Million for 31yr old Mo Salah. Seriously? So it's alright for the Red Top sides to get inflated sums but seemingly not ok for City?
3) Is this the first time in football history when a controlling sporting body wants to lower the quality of their sport? Sick of seeing Tiger Woods, Roger Federer, Ronnie O'Sullivan, Usain Bolt, Frankel, Red Rum, etc win. Why don't we just ban them? Let's just ban excellence.