But where did Arsenal get the documents from? It can only be from the PL leadership. Presumably the PL didn't share it with any more of their members. It proves that the PL leaderhship has been colluding with some of its member clubs to damage City. A re-run of the UEFA witchunt. If true the remaining PL clubs who are not in the loop will be angry (even those who are opposing City). They are being used as pawns. Masters can't survive this leak in my view.If it was Arsenal who leaked the latest story, would that be acting in good faith?
Yes, I'm sure you found it a real blow.Disappointing to hear Stefan on Talkshite say City probably won’t win the case.
Ah the blame game.
Now I come to think of it where were City the day the Titanic sank?
He should not be able to, but good corporate governance doesn't seem to apply to the PL.But where did Arsenal get the documents from? It can only be from the PL leadership. Presumably the PL didn't share it with any more of their members. It proves that the PL leaderhship has been colluding with some of its member clubs to damage City. A re-run of the UEFA witchunt. If true the remaining PL clubs who are not in the loop will be angry (even those who are opposing City). They are being used as pawns. Masters can't survive this leak in my view.
Didn't the Times article say that the PL had shared it with all 19 clubs to get their input before the hearing?But where did Arsenal get the documents from? It can only be from the PL leadership. Presumably the PL didn't share it with any more of their members. It proves that the PL leaderhship has been colluding with some of its member clubs to damage City. A re-run of the UEFA witchunt. If true the remaining PL clubs who are not in the loop will be angry (even those who are opposing City). They are being used as pawns. Masters can't survive this leak in my view.
Yes, I'm sure you found it a real blow.
You know for someone as willing to play in the limelight and idolised by so many on here, Stefan leaves an awful lot open to a negative headline and possible out of context quote. Sometimes does more harm than good , but with the right intentions.
I don't but I assume the Lawyers have advised the club to persue.No I think the club should drop the case now, if it's as hard as you say to win. Have you got Pannicks number?
He also caveated his statement at least twice that all he had seen was a one sided piece, produced by Lawton and that City's evidence wasn't presented.Think Stefan was just being honest.
Apparently these competition and regulatory legal cases are very difficult to win.
I remember Alan Hanson on MOTD, predicting that City would dominate football for the next ten years. This was at the time of the takeover on 2008. He wasn't far wrong.I remember seeing a quote from Ryan Giggs when Sheik Mansour first invested in City. He said he would start worrying about it when City start winning trophies. My thought at the time was that would be when it's too late. An arrogant reply from a club that assumed they would keep winning. How wrong he was. And now we are eating their lunch everyday.
It did, a redacted version I believe.Didn't the Times article say that the PL had shared it with all 19 clubs to get their input before the hearing?