i agree decent article but to suggest this is just city and the collectivism of the dippers and the rags has not been insidious in the prem over a number of years is false.
City launch legal action against the Premier League
- Thread starter denislawsbackheel
- Start date
Villa in step with City on financial rules after owner’s Abu Dhabi switch
Nassef Sawiris announced plans to move his investment group to Abu Dhabi in December and since then Villa have supported City’s opposition on several issues
www.thetimes.com
Do we know which sponsorships are APT and which are Related party and which are normal a list would give us a chance to spot bias. Which might actually be the main issue more than rules themselves. Chelsea have a relationship for example with their shirt sponsor which doesn’t seem to be an issue but maybe it just feels that way due to the press. Have the Premier league had an issue with it ? Do we know what’s going on with the hotel ?
Kippaxpete
Well-Known Member
What comment?
Ten Hag. He's almost identical.
Stoned Rose
Well-Known Member
Yep but that doesn’t convince me that having to disclose every communication from that period is standard.
i suppose the big question is why now, this investigation has been going on for 5 years and has been referred to the IPC for almost a year, why at this specific point are they being ask to reveal their communications, what has been discovered that would prompt this.
Otamendi's Beard
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 11 Jul 2007
- Messages
- 3,858
But Meta wouldn't be likely to share anything would they? I believe they pride themselves on WhatsApp being a private / encrypted messaging service.
its not up to meta to share, its up to the persons requested to provide the relevant data, if they cannot provide said data, then questions would need to be asked as to why not and what they have to gain by not supplying it, like i said earlier lack of information and the reasons behind that can expose someone just as much as the information itself.
Its like if i said to you where were you between 5 and 8 this morning and you said quite frankly its none of your damn business (and youd be right it isnt) but a lawyer could then ask well why doesnt he want to tell us what he was up to, it must be something nefarious (chances are it isnt) but they will lay the seeds of doubt.