Whether or not
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Sep 2019
- Messages
- 1,179
- Team supported
- MCFC
A lot of posts on this thread have been very funny, and speak really to a sense of bewilderment that the club are seemingly doing this. But if they are, you do have to ask why.
Is the concern that there is organised illegal reselling of tickets on a large scale, much like the court case involving Liverpool at the moment. And if so, do they suspect our own fans of orchestrating it. Or, as many suspect, is the objective simply to find reasons, a pretext, to cancel the season tickets of genuine people, who might transfer the odd ticket to a friend or family member.
If it is the former, then I have no complaints. Any such organised touting needs to be stamped out obviously, but given that the club itself partners with most of the agencies named in the Liverpool case, I have my doubts. If it is the latter, and we are simply after the little people, there is to my mind a fundamental flaw. In that the market is just not there for many games to justify taking a season ticket away, in the hope of then selling it for top dollar. They are creating the empty seats, we are told they wish to avoid.
Personally I find it abhorrent that many clubs, not just City, openly have a commercial relationship with touts like Viagogo, but putting that to one side, could the club not be transparent about what they are trying to achieve with this. A proper explanation would go a long way towards removing a lot of the suspicion and anger.
I won’t hold my breath.
Is the concern that there is organised illegal reselling of tickets on a large scale, much like the court case involving Liverpool at the moment. And if so, do they suspect our own fans of orchestrating it. Or, as many suspect, is the objective simply to find reasons, a pretext, to cancel the season tickets of genuine people, who might transfer the odd ticket to a friend or family member.
If it is the former, then I have no complaints. Any such organised touting needs to be stamped out obviously, but given that the club itself partners with most of the agencies named in the Liverpool case, I have my doubts. If it is the latter, and we are simply after the little people, there is to my mind a fundamental flaw. In that the market is just not there for many games to justify taking a season ticket away, in the hope of then selling it for top dollar. They are creating the empty seats, we are told they wish to avoid.
Personally I find it abhorrent that many clubs, not just City, openly have a commercial relationship with touts like Viagogo, but putting that to one side, could the club not be transparent about what they are trying to achieve with this. A proper explanation would go a long way towards removing a lot of the suspicion and anger.
I won’t hold my breath.

