malg
Well-Known Member
Good read.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
City post record revenues of £473.4million for 16/17
- Thread starter HelloCity
- Start date
HelloCity
Well-Known Member
New kit deal should be being signed late 2017/early 2018.
400%ish bigger than the current one I reckon.
400%ish bigger than the current one I reckon.
Thekinkygoat
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 Aug 2017
- Messages
- 647
If the Etihad deal hasn't been renegotiated, around 10%.As a percentage, can anyone tell me what comes in through Abu Dhabi sponsorship?
You need to de-cloak and post excellent pieces more oftenHi, I've lurked on BM for a few years, but have done a summary of the finances . Happy to post the whole thing direct, as don't want to be accused of anything untoward, but in the meantime you can see it here
http://priceoffootball.com/132-2/
:-)
You need to de-cloak and post excellent pieces more often
:-)
He tagged it "Financial Doping" (it isn't), then claim that City gets sponsors from "related parties to their owners" (which we don't).
hopefully the biggest in football history to get the media even more worked up about our financial situationNew kit deal should be being signed late 2017/early 2018.
400%ish bigger than the current one I reckon.
Prestwich_Blue
Well-Known Member
If the Etihad deal is now up to £60m a season then I'd say about 15% of our total revenue comes from AD-based companies or organisations.If the Etihad deal hasn't been renegotiated, around 10%.
But this misses a very important point. If Etihad were to say that they were withdrawing from sponsorship of the shirts, does anyone really think we couldn't find a suitable replacement who would pay at least the same, such as Nissan for example? Of course we would. So the only ones that, for me, we get only because of our ownership are the ones from Etisalat, TCA Abu Dhabi and Aabar (who have a presence in the UK anyway via stakes in EMI and BP). That's £15m in total tops (and that could be a significant over-estimate)
hopefully the biggest in football history to get the media even more worked up about our financial situation
So it should be we are best club in Europe and now an elite club we should be getting the same as the scum.
Prestwich_Blue
Well-Known Member
You can't say that they aren't parties related to the owner (i.e. Abu Dhabi) but they're not related parties in the accepted legal/accounting sense of the phrase.He tagged it "Financial Doping" (it isn't), then claim that City gets sponsors from "related parties to their owners" (which we don't).
mosssideblue
Well-Known Member
This cannot be right as the rags are adamant that if our owner pulls out we will collapse :)