gkmcfc
Well-Known Member
City’s strategy of adding multiple sponsors and partners really seems to be paying dividends
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
City post record revenues of £473.4million for 16/17
- Thread starter HelloCity
- Start date
Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 60,048
Looking at the trajectory of the increase in turnover each year, how long would it be before we would be ahead of that lot in Trafford?
r.soleofsalford
Well-Known Member
Looking at the trajectory of the increase in turnover each year, how long would it be before we would be ahead of that lot in Trafford?
probably not in my life-time 8-)
Interesting read thanksHi, I've lurked on BM for a few years, but have done a summary of the finances . Happy to post the whole thing direct, as don't want to be accused of anything untoward, but in the meantime you can see it here
http://priceoffootball.com/132-2/
Magicpole
Well-Known Member
Our turnover was £92m and over a third of that we earned through being in the CL.
We have the revenue from 55,000 season books and the rest selling deep fried Mars Bars and Irn Bru.
It's like standing outside a sweetie shop as a kid who hasn't any money.
We do alright considering how much resources we have and hopefully each year get a bit better.
Fucking Stoke have more money than us. Stoke.
What a fucked up world. :)
We have the revenue from 55,000 season books and the rest selling deep fried Mars Bars and Irn Bru.
It's like standing outside a sweetie shop as a kid who hasn't any money.
We do alright considering how much resources we have and hopefully each year get a bit better.
Fucking Stoke have more money than us. Stoke.
What a fucked up world. :)
Prestwich_Blue
Well-Known Member
Kieran's a good guy. I'll happily vouch for him.Lurked you say ?
Are you sure you haven't been here before ?
Their turnover is 107M higher but they pay around 90M more than us in interest, fees and wages. In reality, we've pretty much caught them already.Looking at the trajectory of the increase in turnover each year, how long would it be before we would be ahead of that lot in Trafford?
Ladybarn Blue .
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Sep 2012
- Messages
- 955
Plus 1 .Interesting read thanks
flb
Well-Known Member
Their turnover is 107M higher but they pay around 90M more than us in interest, fees and wages. In reality, we've pretty much caught them already.
When you think there match day revenue is twice ours then off the pitch so to speak we are breathing down there necks , new shirt sponsor and campus sponsor should have us right up there with the twats.
Tick tock !
The match day income gap seems overly large. I think I read on here that we don't include corporate in match day revenue.When you think there match day revenue is twice ours then off the pitch so to speak we are breathing down there necks , new shirt sponsor and campus sponsor should have us right up there with the twats.
Tick tock !
I could have imagined that though.