Their turnover is 107M higher but they pay around 90M more than us in interest, fees and wages. In reality, we've pretty much caught them already.
Hi, I've lurked on BM for a few years, but have done a summary of the finances . Happy to post the whole thing direct, as don't want to be accused of anything untoward, but in the meantime you can see it here
http://priceoffootball.com/132-2/
You the guy who did the book with most expensive teams adjusted for inflation?
That was Tompkins who's a dipper and writes the tompkins times. Bits aren' bad but I doubt this is him. Writing style is different from starters
We did keep the two separate up to 2012 but included them both under Matchday revenue from 2013 I believe.The match day income gap seems overly large. I think I read on here that we don't include corporate in match day revenue.
I could have imagined that though.
Ok thanks. I assume the gap is down to the rags hoovering up corporate sales during their non-hoofball days and higher ticket prices in general.We did keep the two separate up to 2012 but included them both under Matchday revenue from 2013 I believe.
The rags do far better from corporate sales than we do from what I've heard. About 60% of their matchday revenue comes from premium/hospitality tickets. I'd say ours was around 40% at best.Ok thanks. I assume the gap is down to the rags hoovering up corporate sales during their non-hoofball days and higher ticket prices in general.
The rags do far better from corporate sales than we do from what I've heard. About 60% of their matchday revenue comes from premium/hospitality tickets. I'd say ours was around 40% at best.
100%. It's all dodgy accounting, we're actually in shit loads of debt......As a percentage, can anyone tell me what comes in through Abu Dhabi sponsorship?