City v Arsenal Post Match

Jaxite said:
i♥city! said:
Jaxite said:
Why play the waste of space Navas, when we could play Barker?

I was thinking the same thing. Give the EDS boys a run. Navas is below average. I would take the likes of Bolasie and Montero over him any day.

100% agree Navas would literally have nothing to offer if he didn't have pace.
Montero no thanks.Bolasie good shout, brilliant goal in afcon today too!
 
Chippy_boy said:
Really surprised by some of the comments today. I thought we were much better than them today, but we lost. Shit happens, Play that 10 times and we'd win 7 or 8 of them.

They defended well, but created little. By and large, we controlled the game.

Spot on! We were not poor! Poor would have been getting dicked 5-0, Arsenal having numerous chances and ripping us a new one.

I don't understand some reactions sometimes!

We move on and start again!
 
Gabriel said:
Chippy_boy said:
Really surprised by some of the comments today. I thought we were much better than them today, but we lost. Shit happens, Play that 10 times and we'd win 7 or 8 of them.

They defended well, but created little. By and large, we controlled the game.

Agreed.

How many shots on target? I can only remember an effort from Navas straight at the keeper.

How many corners? 16? Again, the keeper did not have to make a save.

Whereas Arsenal looked dangerous on the break on many occasions.

This possession bollocks is starting to sound like the Mancini argument in 2012/13.
 
This is a genuine question, but do only fans of teams other than City post on the post match forum? Asking as much of what I see is so anti- City.

In the words of the 'great' Mr T. 'get some nuts!'
 
We were miles better at keeping the ball but completely ineffective going forwards. What we lacked today was the influence of Yaya who is so powerful in the middle. Having Yaya just beyond either Fern gives us that extra space for Silva. Today we couldn't break them down because their entire gameplan revolved around nullifying Silva and it worked perfectly.

When Silva is taken out of the game we then have to rely on quality out wide and unfortunately Navas/Clichy/Zabs did not deliver what was required. You also have to factor in that Aguero was also completely taken out of the game and with the poor delivery, nothing was ever going to get created. Again the weakness in squad depth is exposed where we take out Yaya and Nasri and we are a top 4 team at best. Those people wanting to sell Yaya must be off their rocker!!
 
daveiw1976 said:
This is a genuine question, but do only fans of teams other than City post on the post match forum? Asking as much of what I see is so anti- City.

In the words of the 'great' Mr T. 'get some nuts!'

What's having nuts got to do with anything? If anything it takes nuts to criticise your team on your team's forum and risk abuse.

What you're suggesting is that its takes nuts to accept defeat without complaint. No it doesnt. Quite the opposite.
 
agyeiboateng said:
i♥city! said:
I really hope that 35milion Mangala deal doesn't back fire. I've been really thinking about that deal and i just don't know why we didn't spend that money on a proper winger. We could have done with Vinny, DM, Sagna, Boyata and either one of Denayer / Rekik.


Money could have been spent on Fabregas or Sanchez

I dont care if i get called a rag, Mangala isn't a 35M CB...no way. He isn't as good as Varane, Laporte or Marquinhos. He was also playing in a shit league.

rag bastard, fuck off
 
Lucky Toma said:
daveiw1976 said:
This is a genuine question, but do only fans of teams other than City post on the post match forum? Asking as much of what I see is so anti- City.

In the words of the 'great' Mr T. 'get some nuts!'

What's having nuts got to do with anything? If anything it takes nuts to criticise your team on your team's forum and risk abuse.

What you're suggesting is that its takes nuts to accept defeat without complaint. No it doesnt. Quite the opposite.

No, I'm saying suck it up ffs, we'll be back. As for criticising on a forum, hardly takes bravery does it? Therefore said nuts refers to being positive and believing -in this case.

Yes I'm pissed, but still positive! ;-)
 
[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EB86UzewPdo[/video]



Deny the passenger, who want to get on
Deny the passenger, who want to get on
Deny the passenger, who want to get on
Want to get on, he want to get on
Want to get on, he want to get on

To make a chain of fools, you need a matching pair
One hypocritical fool and the crowd that's never there
There's anger in the silence, there's wheels upon the jail
A black train built of bones on a copper rail


Manchester city is in your blood and just for Christmas

(fuck off glory hunters)
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.