Marvin said:I had Kolarov down as one of City's best players. Silva and Nasri struggled to dictate the game in the way they usually do, but the game was full of quality, and played at a very high intensity.Damocles said:Havent seen any press or read any posts yet so I'm probably repeating.
We did alright against a very dangerous Napoli. They came with a gameplan to defend in numbers and snatch a goal on the counter and it worked for them. They are a very hard team to beat at the best of times.
Thought Kolarov was poor, especially in the first half where he was constantly outwitted by the movement and technique of Hamsik. Yaya was frustrating as he was often caught dwelling on the ball, which stopped a lot of our momentum at times. For the third match this year, Kompany has made a mistake which cost us a goal which is worrying.
AJ was a change for the better but I can't help but feel that it came ten minutes too late. We ran out of ideas in the later parts until the subs came on.
The biggest thing to affect us was nerves. You could see it in the stadium which transferred to the players. It increased as the game became more frustrating. A point is alright and I still fancy us to win the group.
I don't think all Champions League games are like that. We've just got a very tough group because we are a third seed.
AJ and Tevez could have perhaps come on 10 mins earlier - you could see Napoli getting more of the game in the 2nd half
Fair enough, I thought Kola was out of position a lot and didn't have the pace to catch up when Napoli were breaking, often leaving us outnumbered at the back. I also thought that Hamisk got the better of him quite regularly and he didn't really give anyone a hard time, his crossing was near non-existent.
Agree with Silva and NAsri, but essentially when their wingbacks dropped back, with their 3 CBs and 2 DMs, they were playing 7 at the back, which allowed them that sort of pressing without leaving too much gap.