CITY v Newcastle Utd - Official Match Thread

Sabster said:
Somud said:
Perhaps because he thinks Tevez won't be as effective on the right forward position and he doesn't think Lescott is up for an attacking full back role in a diamond system.

Tevez was really poor on the left side on thursday wan't he.

Lescott can not provide the same support as Zab can attacking wise down that left channel. I think it we should be positive about the system Mancini has put forward today and be optimistic.
 
80s Shorts said:
Sabster said:
No equally I shoudl have said Barry or De Jong

But I just prefer Barry

Entitled to your opinion but I dont think we will ever agree. Control the centre of the park and win the game. Yaya, Milner and Barry are all well capable of switching from defence to attack.

I am sorry bu a midfield of milner, yaya and barry can control a game brilliantly.
 
If we win we are second. If that's a negative manager then give me it any day.
 
What is it with this obsession of some posters about playing "attacking" football.

Would you be happy with a draw/loss as long as Mancini played "attacking" football?

Whether we win 1-0 or 6-0 its still 3 pts.

Mancini is playing to our strengths, even if we had Balotelli fit and Ade on song we wouldn't be playing 4-3-3 with 3 forwards on the pitch. Win the midfield, win the game, aka Chelski.

I happen to think the team he's put out will win 3 or 4 nil.
 
god not sabster..zzZzzzz

anyways come on city i support whatever line up mancini puts out he is the manager
 
Sabster said:
80s Shorts said:
Entitled to your opinion but I dont think we will ever agree. Control the centre of the park and win the game. Yaya, Milner and Barry are all well capable of switching from defence to attack.

I am sorry bu a midfield of milner, yaya and barry can control a game brilliantly.

That is what I said, with the inclusion of an enforcer such as deJong then any of the said three can switch the play and be an attacking midfielder.<br /><br />-- Sun Oct 03, 2010 1:22 pm --<br /><br />
woolleyback blue said:
What is it with this obsession of some posters about playing "attacking" football.

Would you be happy with a draw/loss as long as Mancini played "attacking" football?

Whether we win 1-0 or 6-0 its still 3 pts.

Mancini is playing to our strengths, even if we had Balotelli fit and Ade on song we wouldn't be playing 4-3-3 with 3 forwards on the pitch. Win the midfield, win the game, aka Chelski.

I happen to think the team he's put out will win 3 or 4 nil.


Agreed.
 
I love the professional tacticians who appear on here and on pre-match phone ins before each game. Absolutely full of shit.

Mancini is the manager and he gets paid to do it. I'll go with whatever he picks because he knows better than I and anyone else here.
 
PreMatchStress is well and truly set in now...

-- Sun Oct 03, 2010 11:27 pm --

Chrispy said:
I love the professional tacticians who appear on here and on pre-match phone ins before each game. Absolutely full of shit.

Mancini is the manager and he gets paid to do it. I'll go with whatever he picks because he knows better than I and anyone else here.

I completely agree mate..too right<br /><br />-- Sun Oct 03, 2010 11:29 pm --<br /><br />3 strikers
2 mids (counting johnson)
and only 1 defender...i guess we gotta hope for no more injuries
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.