City vs Aston Villa Pre Match Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ducado

Well-Known Member
Joined
3 Aug 2007
Messages
30,761
Location
where the tide never comes in
Team supported
City
Villa seem much improved of late, I don't know if their victory against Liverpool and their appearance in the FA Cup final will effect them, one thing for sure if we go out at a pedestrian pace they will catch us on the break

All in here Please

5:30 KO as well
 
Expecting a pretty dull and standard win here.

Despite their stuff against the scousers (and well done for that Villa), they aren't really world beaters and Tim Sherwood should be carrying a big NEW MANAGER BOUNCE sign around his neck. The teams who beat us are the ones who sit back defensively, press us until their legs drop off, then pounce forward with a long ball. Not really Villa's style despite a few quick players in their team.

Not super concerned about this one really and don't think it will be a particularly fine match for the neutral.

Also, never forget these pricks:

A move to a club who have qualified for the Champions League would have shown he did want to move to play in that competition as he had claimed. Had he delayed signing for Manchester City for a day or two in a bid to flush out interest from the likes of Liverpool then he might have still got away with claiming that football reasons were the driving force behind his move from us. But, his hurried signing for a team that ended the season below us and out of Europe shows him for what he is a mercenary who has moved for money and for money alone.

He contributed a lot to the club during his years with us and we gave him a lot back by making him into an England regular. His actions last summer were hard to take and the reaction he got from the fans this season after that say a lot for how much we thought of him. Those feelings were clearly not reciprocated and he will not be such a hero in Manchester as he was at Villa Park. Sadly he chose money ahead of our bright future and loyalty. He now has his "dream move" and we have a decent fee for him but for me he is no longer entitled to the term "Villa great" he is a player who moved for money unlike the likes of Bruce Rioch who moved for football reasons or Kaka who turned down Manchester City's millions for the same reason. His decision to move does not say a lot about the man we once thought so much of. :(

Really hoped he would sign a new contract but after last summer's song and dance with the sly Rafa, it was a foregone conclusion that he'd waltz off either now or on a Bosman next summer. I am very happy that neither Liverpool or Arsenal got him, but pretty peeved by his decision.

Give or take, if I am generous, I can suggest that City and Villa have equal ambition and equal managers. Neither team is in the Champions League (although we are in the Europa League). Both teams are outside the Big 4. Both teams have decent support and similar profile. We have a better long-term history, recent-history and current form. We have the best owner, they have the richest owner. If you take all those points into consideration there can only be one reason that Barry chose to join Manchester City: money.

He can't claim Champions League and he can't claim ambition. He could have claimed he wanted a change. We gave classy Mellberg a classy send-off when he expressed a desire to play in Italy. If Barry had been honest and stated he simply wanted a change, we may have been more understanding, but for me there will always be the lingering truth that it was even more money than the respectable pay wages we paid him that took him away from the team that groomed him to be a star and which gave him a regular England place.

I can't wait to finish ahead of City again next season.
 
This will be a lot tougher than West Ham thats for sure. It would help our cause if the players pulled the trigger a little bit more oh and hit the target. I think we'll win by two clear goals although I'm taking nothing for granted. Well done the Villa for beating the Bin Dippers and booking a Wembley final.
 
Damocles said:
Expecting a pretty dull and standard win here.

Despite their stuff against the scousers (and well done for that Villa), they aren't really world beaters and Tim Sherwood should be carrying a big NEW MANAGER BOUNCE sign around his neck. The teams who beat us are the ones who sit back defensively, press us until their legs drop off, then pounce forward with a long ball. Not really Villa's style despite a few quick players in their team.

Not super concerned about this one really and don't think it will be a particularly fine match for the neutral.

Also, never forget these pricks:

A move to a club who have qualified for the Champions League would have shown he did want to move to play in that competition as he had claimed. Had he delayed signing for Manchester City for a day or two in a bid to flush out interest from the likes of Liverpool then he might have still got away with claiming that football reasons were the driving force behind his move from us. But, his hurried signing for a team that ended the season below us and out of Europe shows him for what he is a mercenary who has moved for money and for money alone.

He contributed a lot to the club during his years with us and we gave him a lot back by making him into an England regular. His actions last summer were hard to take and the reaction he got from the fans this season after that say a lot for how much we thought of him. Those feelings were clearly not reciprocated and he will not be such a hero in Manchester as he was at Villa Park. Sadly he chose money ahead of our bright future and loyalty. He now has his "dream move" and we have a decent fee for him but for me he is no longer entitled to the term "Villa great" he is a player who moved for money unlike the likes of Bruce Rioch who moved for football reasons or Kaka who turned down Manchester City's millions for the same reason. His decision to move does not say a lot about the man we once thought so much of. :(

Really hoped he would sign a new contract but after last summer's song and dance with the sly Rafa, it was a foregone conclusion that he'd waltz off either now or on a Bosman next summer. I am very happy that neither Liverpool or Arsenal got him, but pretty peeved by his decision.

Give or take, if I am generous, I can suggest that City and Villa have equal ambition and equal managers. Neither team is in the Champions League (although we are in the Europa League). Both teams are outside the Big 4. Both teams have decent support and similar profile. We have a better long-term history, recent-history and current form. We have the best owner, they have the richest owner. If you take all those points into consideration there can only be one reason that Barry chose to join Manchester City: money.

He can't claim Champions League and he can't claim ambition. He could have claimed he wanted a change. We gave classy Mellberg a classy send-off when he expressed a desire to play in Italy. If Barry had been honest and stated he simply wanted a change, we may have been more understanding, but for me there will always be the lingering truth that it was even more money than the respectable pay wages we paid him that took him away from the team that groomed him to be a star and which gave him a regular England place.

I can't wait to finish ahead of City again next season.

I wonder if they still think they have the best owner.
 
Same team please, same formation, same result .

If it ain't broke don't fix it. With exception of having Bony on the bench instead of Dzeko.
 
They were all over Liverpool, pressing high up the pitch and forcing errors. Exactly the sort of play that will cause problems for us. Whether they can match that intensity outside of a cup game is another question. They've got a long wait for the FA Cup final now, so I don't expect it to distract them too much though. And they're not playing in midweek or anything.
 
icemanbops said:
Same team please, same formation, same result .

If it ain't broke don't fix it. With exception of having Bony on the bench instead of Dzeko.
You'd still play Lampard?

Silva might be out too.
 
I'm With Stupid said:
icemanbops said:
Same team please, same formation, same result .

If it ain't broke don't fix it. With exception of having Bony on the bench instead of Dzeko.
You'd still play Lampard?

Silva might be out too.

Diniho for lampard cluchy for kolarov and jovetic for silva if unfit/fit
 
3-1 city
Same team vs West Ham depending if silva plays (hearing he will be fit)

Villa could be tricky but thinking about it, I would of thought we would have enough for them just be weary of Benteke and grealish can be dangerous.


Aguero 1st goal
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.